Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot?

From: Lady Chatterly (mbbruce_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 10/03/04 

Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 9:49:19 GMT

In article <602faa6b.0410030130.135b70be@posting.google.com>,
mbbruce@mighty.co.za (Michael Baldwin Bruce) wrote:
>
>Lady Chatterly <mbbruce@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote in message news:<5a6334f.b771b34f@chatterly.strzelec.net>...
>> In article <602faa6b.0410020126.2681190a@posting.google.com>,
>> mbbruce@mighty.co.za (Michael Baldwin Bruce) wrote:
>> >
>> >tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<sLm7d.1164$z04.25@twister.socal.rr.com>...
>> >> Richard Steiner writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Count Floyd wrote:
>>
>> >> >> This newsgroup is inundated with this trash, Elizbot, digests, Bruce,
>> >> >> etc. These posters need to take this to email.
>>
>> >> > I've read the OS/2 newsgroups for almost ten years, and some of these
>> >> > folks have been posting this kind of trash for almost that long.
>> >>
>> >> No kidding?
>> >>
>> >> > If you believe they will stop sometime soon, you are mistaken. They
>> >> > are one of the reasons why many newsreaders have filtering or scoring
>> >> > capabilities. Learn to use them, and the problem disappears.
>> >>
>> >> If you had practiced what you preach, Steiner, your "Splunge!" response
>> >> to Bruce would not have shown up in rec.music.classical.
>> >
>> >Stand and deliver! Drop that gun! Let that be a warning to you all. You move
>> >at your peril, for I have two pistols here. I know one of them isn't loaded
>> >any more, but the other one is, so that's one of you dead for sure...or just
>> >about for sure anyway. It certainly wouldn't be worth your while risking it
>> >because I'm a very good shot. I practice every day...well, not absolutely
>> >every day, but most days in the week...I expect I must practice, oh, at least
>> >four or five times a week at least...at least four or five, only some
>> >weekends...like last weekend, there really wasn't the time, so that moved
>> >the average down a bit...but I should say it's definitely a solid four days'
>> >practice a week...at least. I mean...I reckon I could hit that tree over
>> >there...the one just behind that hillock...not the big hillock, the little
>> >hillock on the left. You see the three trees, the third from the left and
>> >back a bit - that one - I reckon I clould hit that four times out of five...
>> >on a good day. Say with this wind...say, say, seven times out of ten...
>>
>> Does it make I curious to be a very good shot?
>
>Well it doesn't matter, anyway. I can hit it seven times out of ten, that's
>the point.

Huh? You're being redundant. 

--
Lady Chatterly
"Looks like Goofy found a kindred intelligence. Too bad it's a bot."
-- Cujo DeSockpuppet

Relevant Pages