Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453286"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: CVF bug ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 7 Oct 2004 21:27:46 -0700
tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<8Hh9d.777$nl4.746@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
>
> >>>>>> Classic denial, given that I made no such admission, yet you claim
> >>>>>> otherwise.
>
> >>>>> What is "amde," Hypocrite?
>
> >>>> What does your question have to do with OS/2, grantco?
>
> >>> Note: No response..
>
> >> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
> >> The above constitutes a response.
>
> > No, its a question.
>
> A question is a response, grantco.
>
> > Under your definition the statement below is also a response:
> >
> > thiridckdsksjsuswiiwiwwo...
>
> Irrelevant, grantco, given that I never said it wasn't a response.
>
> >>>> I see that you completely evaded the matter of your stalking me.
> >>>> No surprise there, really. After all, how long can a charade last?
>
> >>> "Evaded?" obviously you have yet to read my other posts where I
> >>> further substantated my claim.
>
> >> The key words here are "other posts", which is a sort of back-handed
> >> way of admitting that you evaded the matter in the posting of yours
> >> to which I responded, grantco.
>
> > In what way?
>
> You didn't address the matter of your stalking me in the indicated
> response, grantco.
>
> >>> This thread is in EVERY newsroup where Michael Baldwin Bruce
> >>> crossposted it, complete and unedited when viewed from google groups.
>
> >> Irrelevant, given that the issue isn't the thread, grantco, but rather
> >> your postings, which are not cross-posted. Of course, I've said that
> >> before as well, which you would know by now if you had better reading
> >> comprehension skills.
>
> > My posting are part of the THREAD idiot.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing the existence of a "THREAD idiot",
> grantco.
>
> >>> Look in comp.os.os2.advocacy, sci.astro, comp.lang.fortran,
> >>> rec.music.classical, and comp.os.linux.advocacy via google groups.
> >>> This entire thread is readable from ANY of these groups.
>
> >> Unnecessary, given that the issue isn't the thread, grantco, but rather
> >> your postings, which are not cross-posted. Of course, I've said that
> >> before as well, which you would know by now if you had better reading
> >> comprehension skills.
>
> > "Unnecessary?" obviously you still fear and know you'd be proven wrong
> > if you did.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Typical...
>
> Yes, your unsubstantiated and erroneous claims are indeed typical,
> grantco. No need to tell me that.
>
> >>> Obviously you are ignorant of the working of google groups, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and quite ironic, coming
> >> from someone who is ignorant of the working of google groups.
>
> > Who between the 2 of us doesn't use google groups every day to read
> > rec.music.classical?
>
> Irrelevant, grantco; the issue isn't who uses what to read a
> newsgroup, but rather your stalking of me.
>
> > I'll gived you a hint. Its the person who couldn't figure out to
> > simply go to the group and read thru the list of threads. His name
> > starts with a "T" and ends with an "holen."
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> pity...
>
> >> Yes, your problem is a pity, grantco.
>
> > You really must venture out of the playground, Tholen...
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> >>> Now let's see how long YOUR charade lasts, shall we?
>
> >> You're erroneously presupposing some charade on my part, Grantco.
>
> > You freely said that going to the actual groups involved was
> > "unneccessary" on your part.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> > Hence your continuing charade...
>
> Illogical.
>
> >>> By the way, what is "amde," Hypocrite?
>
> >> What does your question have to do with OS/2, grantco?
>
> > I don't know Tholen.
>
> Then why are you posting it to an OS/2 newsgroup, grantco?
>
> > You posted "amde" on os/2 (and it also appeared
> > at rec.music.classical).
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > If you don't know the answer to what your own word means or what
> > it has to do with OS/2 you are further behind than I.
>
> You're erroneously presuppsing that I asked a question about my own
> word, grantco. Rather, I asked a question about your question.
> That you can't tell the difference between my own word and your own
> question is perfectly consistent with your inability to tell the
> difference between comp.os.os2.advocacy and rec.music.classical.
> Or rec.music.progressive, for that matter.
That's still not grounds for calling me seņor, or Don Beeg-les for that matter,
bruce.
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453286"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: CVF bug ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
