Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: jim: "fortran and mac"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Elizabot digest, volume 2453288"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Oct 2004 01:08:35 -0700
tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<Nl0ad.4122$nl4.374@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> grantco writes:
>
> > Oooh,
>
> What does that have to do with OS/2, grantco?
>
> > And don't forget to bring up the typing errors in my last post, Tholen.
>
> What do your typing errors have to do with OS/2, grantco?
>
> > Unlike you I am man enough to admit they were there...
>
> What does your manhood have to do with OS/2, grantco? Ironically, you
> still aren't man enough to admit that your postings are NOT appearing
> in rec.music.classical, contrary to your earlier claims, grantco.
> Lately you've resorted to discussing the thread, diverting attention
> away from your postings.
>
> > So go lay by your dish Tholen.
>
> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with OS/2, grantco?
>
> > Good dog...
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I'm a dog, grantco. But it's
> amusing to know that you think a dog knows more about how Google
> Groups works than you do, grantco.
What a silly bunt.
- Next message: jim: "fortran and mac"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Elizabot digest, volume 2453288"
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Next in thread: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|