Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453296

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 10/21/04 

Date: 21 Oct 2004 02:23:56 -0700

bruce aka tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<e9scd.13150$Kl3.2502@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Today's Sandman digest:
>
> 386> Incorrect, given the total lack of any reference to you.
>
> Liar:
>
> "Could anyone point me in the direction on how to program
> a bot such as Tholen? How do you manage its dictionary? I
> would want it to have a much bigger vocabulary than Tholen
> does (what was its writers thinking, giving it a fifty-word
> vocabulary or something like that). It should also have some
> intelligence built in, as opposed to Tholen, so it could
> choose phrases according to the situation (again, as opposed
> to Tholen)."
> --Sandman
>
> 386> The paragraph below only mentions references to "a bot such as
> 386> Tholen".
>
> Liar:
>
> "Could anyone point me in the direction on how to program
> a bot such as Tholen? How do you manage its dictionary? I
> would want it to have a much bigger vocabulary than Tholen
> does (what was its writers thinking, giving it a fifty-word
> vocabulary or something like that). It should also have some
> intelligence built in, as opposed to Tholen, so it could
> choose phrases according to the situation (again, as opposed
> to Tholen)."
> --Sandman
>
> 386> It is quite clear that I am in reference to a program, not
> 386> you - that is, unless you claim that you're a program.
>
> Liar:
>
> "Could anyone point me in the direction on how to program
> a bot such as Tholen? How do you manage its dictionary? I
> would want it to have a much bigger vocabulary than Tholen
> does (what was its writers thinking, giving it a fifty-word
> vocabulary or something like that). It should also have some
> intelligence built in, as opposed to Tholen, so it could
> choose phrases according to the situation (again, as opposed
> to Tholen)."
> --Sandman

is that right, bruce?

Relevant Pages