Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?
From: James Van Buskirk (not_valid_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Previous message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: table interface for user input in windows"
- In reply to: Scott Robert Ladd: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Next in thread: Tim Prince: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Reply: Tim Prince: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:33:38 GMT
"Scott Robert Ladd" <coyote@coyotegulch.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.10.30.16.18.41.186803@coyotegulch.com...
> One thing I'm looking for is code that stresses
> F90/95 compilers, for use in the test suite.
Oh, I've got plenty of that. There are even a couple of toughies
on my website, http://home.comcast.net/~kmbtib/index.html . scaled2h.f90
and conv2b.f90 seem to be a bit problematic. They also, if you can get
them to run, generate code that can itself give problems to compilers
because of its size, e.g. the output of scaled2h.f90 with an input of
12 seems to be rather on the large size as far as some compilers are
concerned. The programs have pretty good checks for correctness in
that the codes they generate are test programs that should yield errors
on the order of double precision epsilon. Unfortunately I don't have
the resources available to install anything more challenging than F on
'doze, so I can't test the current free compilers personally.
-- write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, & 6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
- Previous message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: table interface for user input in windows"
- In reply to: Scott Robert Ladd: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Next in thread: Tim Prince: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Reply: Tim Prince: "Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|