comp.lang.fortran
By Author

1103 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

Starting: 09/30/04
Ending: 10/31/04

]SiLVieTTa[
- Re: download fortran 4.0 power station (10/18/04)
- download fortran 4.0 power station (10/15/04)
Aardpig
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (09/30/04)
ah
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
Aidan
- Re: Initialisation expression using overloaded intrinisic operator (10/25/04)
- Initialisation expression using overloaded intrinisic operator (10/22/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/22/04)
Alan Greynolds
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
Alan Ross
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Reading Tab Separated Files (10/24/04)
Aleph Mobius
- Lahey FORTRAN for DOS (10/31/04)
Alex
- Re: Picking-up the Euphonium after 8 years (10/03/04)
Alfredo Buttari
- Re: fortran and mac (10/11/04)
Alois Steindl
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/27/04)
analyst41
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/03/04)
Andreas Krebs
- Re: graphics with g77 GNU fortran compiler (10/25/04)
- Re: interface with ifort compiler (10/21/04)
- Re: interface with ifort compiler (10/20/04)
- interface with ifort compiler (10/20/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/07/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
Andy Vaught
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/21/04)
- Exciting new feature for g95 (10/20/04)
- Exciting new feature for g95 (10/20/04)
Angelo
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
Anonymous
- Re: IBM Optimization Library - Open Source (10/15/04)
- Formatting reals without leading blanks (10/15/04)
Antonio Parodi
- open a file in a specific directory (10/07/04)
antst
- Re: strange IFC problem. (10/03/04)
- strange IFC problem. (10/02/04)
Aratzio
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
Arindam Chakraborty
- Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
Arjen Markus
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/19/04)
- Re: download fortran 4.0 power station (10/18/04)
- Re: fortran with Java? (10/13/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/08/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/07/04)
- Re: TRANSFER() & friends (was Re: a history question) (10/06/04)
- Re: TRANSFER() & friends (was Re: a history question) (10/04/04)
- Re: Documentation tools for Fortran? (10/04/04)
- Documentation tools for Fortran? (10/04/04)
- Re: Garbage collection (Was: Re: a history question) (10/04/04)
- Re: Latest Fortran stuff and other stuff (10/01/04)
- Garbage collection (Was: Re: a history question) (10/01/04)
Arnaud Desitter
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
Art Deco
- Re: digest 2453296 (10/22/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/16/04)
- New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
Athanasios Migdalas
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
b s
- Re: How to tell who's a troll (10/16/04)
- Re: OT: Legitmate NG Post from Dave Tholen (10/16/04)
B52B
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/14/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/06/04)
beliavsky_at_aol.com
- Re: Documentation tools for Fortran? (10/31/04)
- Re: Lahey FORTRAN for DOS (10/31/04)
- Re: table interface for user input in windows (10/30/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
- aliased intent(in out) arguments (10/26/04)
- Re: Input/Output-Interface for Fortran program - please help :-) (10/24/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/23/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/22/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/21/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/19/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: Fortran Compiler F77L - EM32 FORTRAN 77, version 5.20 (10/07/04)
- Re: Garbage collection (Was: Re: a history question) (10/04/04)
- Re: Latest Fortran stuff and other stuff (10/01/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
Ben Barrowes
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
- overload array index operator (10/15/04)
bendel boy
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
Bhavesh Goswami
- CPU utilization never goes above 50% in Fortran code (10/29/04)
Bil Kleb
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/29/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/28/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/28/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/26/04)
Bill Bertram
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/07/04)
Brian Inglis
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
Brian Sieben
- G77 undefined reference to `MAIN__' (10/07/04)
bv
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/30/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/29/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/24/04)
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Re: Fortran Compiler F77L - EM32 FORTRAN 77, version 5.20 (10/06/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/06/04)
- Re: cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/04/04)
- cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: "14 % 8" for example... (10/01/04)
Carlie J. Coats
- F2007: another possible improvement (10/29/04)
Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/22/04)
- Re: open a file in a specific directory (10/12/04)
- Re: open a file in a specific directory (10/08/04)
- Re: generate pdf from Fortran (10/04/04)
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
- Re: Execution problem in Compaq Visual Studio 6.0 (10/01/04)
Chandra Chilmakuri
- Reading signed binary file in FORTRAN (10/30/04)
- Re: CPU utilization never goes above 50% in Fortran code (10/30/04)
Charles Russell
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
Charlie Gibbs
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
Cheng Cosine
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/21/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/21/04)
- ? open SVD f90 code (10/19/04)
Chris
- looking for early Fortran compiler (10/08/04)
Chris Murray
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/02/04)
Cicero
- Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/30/04)
- Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/30/04)
- Input/Output-Interface for Fortran program - please help :-) (10/23/04)
Crabby Gator
- weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
Dan Tex1
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/24/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/02/04)
Dan Holm
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (09/30/04)
Dan Nagle
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/05/04)
Daniel Grimwood
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
Dave Seaman
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/25/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/24/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/24/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/20/04)
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: fortran and mac (10/11/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
Dave Thompson
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/15/04)
- Re: a history question (10/04/04)
- Re: a history question (10/04/04)
Dave Weatherall
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
David Frank
- Re: Reading signed binary file in FORTRAN (10/30/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/30/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/30/04)
- Re: CPU utilization never goes above 50% in Fortran code (10/29/04)
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/29/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- F2003 and varying strings (10/27/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Formatting reals without leading blanks (10/15/04)
David Ham
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/14/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
David Larsen
- Removing QuickWin (10/06/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/05/04)
- MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/04/04)
David T. Croft, Ph.D.
- Fortran for .NET Help (10/05/04)
- test (10/05/04)
Dick Hendrickson
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: F2007: another possible improvement (10/29/04)
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/28/04)
- Re: aliased intent(in out) arguments (10/26/04)
- Re: Will 'empty' dimensions affect performance ? (10/23/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
Dieter Britz
- Function evaluation (10/25/04)
Douglas Cox
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/17/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/14/04)
DP
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/01/04)
dpbozarth
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/23/04)
Dr Chaos
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/11/04)
- Re: a history question (10/07/04)
Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/30/04)
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/29/04)
- Re: Schwarz-Christoffel Conformal Mapping (10/17/04)
- Re: Algorittm.... (10/17/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/12/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: strange IFC problem. (10/02/04)
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
DrPostman
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/20/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/18/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/17/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/17/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/08/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/08/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/06/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/06/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/06/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/05/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/01/04)
dud_address_at_xparadise.net.nz
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
E P Chandler
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/06/04)
Elizabot v2.0.2
- Re: digest 2453286 (10/08/04)
- Re: digest 2453281 (10/08/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/04/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/04/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/04/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
Eric K.
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
Erik Edelmann
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
Evangelos Boutsianis
- Re: Schwarz-Christoffel Conformal Mapping (10/17/04)
- Schwarz-Christoffel Conformal Mapping (10/16/04)
Fabrice Bentejac LM2S
- Re: size of integer in g77 (10/14/04)
- size of integer in g77 (10/13/04)
FCC
- Re: system calls in g95 (10/22/04)
- system calls in g95 (10/21/04)
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/21/04)
Fred Bloggs
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/06/04)
Frederick Shorts
- Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/05/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
Gareth McCaughan
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/03/04)
Gareth Owen
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/19/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
Gene Wirchenko
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/24/04)
Gernot Pfanner
- Computing the number of coin combinations? (10/31/04)
Gerry Thomas
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/11/04)
- Re: CreateProcess and Console Application (10/07/04)
- Re: Running external programs with CVF (10/07/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/03/04)
- Re: Intel Fortran 8.1 and MS VC++ 2003 (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/02/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: Execution problem in Compaq Visual Studio 6.0 (10/01/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/01/04)
Gib Bogle
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/12/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/05/04)
Giorgos Momferratos
- ascii & newlines in unformatted file (10/13/04)
glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Lahey FORTRAN for DOS (10/31/04)
- Re: CPU utilization never goes above 50% in Fortran code (10/30/04)
- Re: mtprng or abs() problem; g95 (10/29/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/25/04)
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/22/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: Windows XP (10/20/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/19/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/13/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/12/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/08/04)
- Re: looking for early Fortran compiler (10/08/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/05/04)
- Re: read(5,*) problem? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
- Re: a history question (09/30/04)
Glyn Edwards
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
Gordon Sande
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/16/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: fortran and mac (10/11/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- NAMELIST Names (10/05/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
grantco
- Re: digest 2453292 (10/14/04)
- Re: digest 2453286 (10/08/04)
Harold Stevens
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/02/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/01/04)
HeartVFire
- Looking for an old Fortran book (10/24/04)
Helge Avlesen
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
Herman D. Knoble
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/14/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- IBM Optimization Library - Open Source (10/11/04)
- Re: looking for early Fortran compiler (10/08/04)
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
hongjuny
- Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/25/04)
hou
- how to free the handleing? (10/13/04)
I.C.
- My old FORTRAN Powerstation 1.0 does not work on my new computer, in WIN98SE (10/25/04)
Ian Bush
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/14/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
igor
- Re: generate pdf from Fortran (10/04/04)
Ioannis Vranos
- Latest Fortran stuff and other stuff (10/01/04)
J Ahlstrom
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
J. F. Cornwall
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/16/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
J.F. Cornwall
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
JA
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
Jacek
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- FFTW and ifort (10/08/04)
James Giles
- Re: F2007 possible improvement (10/31/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/30/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/30/04)
- Re: mtprng or abs() problem; g95 (10/29/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/29/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: F2007 possible improvement (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/27/04)
- Re: Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
- Re: aliased intent(in out) arguments (10/26/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/12/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NAMELIST Names (10/06/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/05/04)
- Re: TRANSFER() & friends (was Re: a history question) (10/04/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
- Re: cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/02/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
- Re: "14 % 8" for example... (10/01/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
- Re: a history question (09/30/04)
- Re: a history question (09/30/04)
James Parsly
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
James Van Buskirk
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/30/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/25/04)
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/24/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Help --- continued code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: Allocatable arrays in thread safe code (10/01/04)
jan van oosterwijk
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: Formatting reals without leading blanks (10/15/04)
- Re: open a file in a specific directory (10/11/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
Jan Vorbr�ggen
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/25/04)
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/25/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/05/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/05/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
Janne Blomqvist
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: graphics with g77 GNU fortran compiler (10/25/04)
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/25/04)
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin - similar problem (10/22/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/21/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: a history question (10/06/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
Jason
- Help --- continued code conversion (10/20/04)
- Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Help please with a small code conversion (10/19/04)
Jason Nielsen
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/18/04)
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/18/04)
- f95 interpreter (10/17/04)
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
Jean-Baptiste FAURE
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin (10/21/04)
- installing g95 under cygwin (10/20/04)
Jeevan
- Re: Do any one know...... (10/11/04)
- Do any one know...... (10/07/04)
Jeff Layton
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
jfglass
- Re: Re: Windows XP (10/20/04)
jim
- fortran and mac (10/10/04)
Jim S
- Lahey on Fedora (10/18/04)
joel GUERRERO
- How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/15/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/14/04)
- allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/14/04)
John Appleyard
- Re: Polyhedron Benchmarks on AMD Opteron (10/04/04)
John C. Bollinger
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
John Harper
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/29/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- F2007 possible improvement (10/28/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/06/04)
John S
- SCSI Ultra 320 IO Result Request (10/01/04)
Joost VandeVondele
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin - similar problem (10/22/04)
- Re: system calls in g95 (10/21/04)
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin (10/20/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
Jose L Gomez-Dans
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/08/04)
- Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- Lapack95, ifort and Intel MKL (10/07/04)
Juergen
- Look at this before considering to use Intel Visual FORTRAN (10/07/04)
Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/30/04)
- Re: Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/30/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/21/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/19/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/07/04)
- Re: What's wrong with my program?? About Module file. (10/04/04)
- Re: Allocatable arrays in thread safe code (10/01/04)
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
K Williams
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: graphics with g77 GNU fortran compiler (10/26/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/22/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/11/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/09/04)
- Re: Free, unsupported Intel MKL & VTune (10/06/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
Kay
- Re: fortran with Java? (10/14/04)
- fortran with Java? (10/13/04)
Ken Plotkin
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/30/04)
- Re: Input/Output-Interface for Fortran program - please help :-) (10/24/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/17/04)
- Re: download fortran 4.0 power station (10/15/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/08/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/07/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/06/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/05/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/04/04)
- Re: generate pdf from Fortran (10/04/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/02/04)
- Re: Object oriented C++ in numerical analysis (10/02/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: My old FORTRAN Powerstation 1.0 does not work on my new computer, in WIN98SE (10/25/04)
- Re: Windows XP (10/20/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/19/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/16/04)
- Re: looking for early Fortran compiler (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/05/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/04/04)
kia
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/17/04)
Knight Of Fairness
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/04/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/04/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/04/04)
Lady Chatterly
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/17/04)
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/03/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/03/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/03/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/03/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: digest 2453281 (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/02/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/02/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/02/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/02/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/01/04)
Lars Schouw
- generate pdf from Fortran (10/04/04)
Lawson B. Wakefield
- Re: getarg & 8.3 filename (10/01/04)
Lee Bassom
- Re: Packed data ? (10/07/04)
- Packed data ? (10/07/04)
Leif Harcke
- Re: looking for early Fortran compiler (10/09/04)
Les
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/04/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/01/04)
leslie
- Re: a history question (10/03/04)
letoured_at_nospam.net
- marty-jeff GROW UP (10/04/04)
Louis Krupp
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/08/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/05/04)
Lucian Anton
- mtprng or abs() problem; g95 (10/29/04)
M. Faust
- Re: Visual Fortran - super quick questions (10/31/04)
Madhusudan Singh
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/20/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- gfortran vs. g95 (10/12/04)
- Re: fortran and mac (10/11/04)
- Re: Do any one know...... (10/07/04)
MARK REAP
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/16/04)
- Which Compiler to Purchase (10/16/04)
Markus Gronotte
- Wait (10/17/04)
Marty
- Re: Can't we get rid of: [FUD4]? (10/04/04)
Matthew Halfant
- Another more exotic method (10/31/04)
- Re: Computing the number of coin combinations? (10/31/04)
meek_at_skyway.usask.ca
- RE: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- RE: Re: Windows XP (10/20/04)
- RE: Help please with a small code conversion (10/19/04)
- RE: ascii & newlines in unformatted file (10/13/04)
- RE: Mutual file sharing with 2 or more CVF files (10/13/04)
- RE: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- RE: Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- RE: Packed data ? (10/07/04)
- RE: Mixing Format Specification with parameters (09/30/04)
Michael Baldwin Bruce
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453299 (10/21/04)
- Re: Bass digest, volume 2453298 (10/21/04)
- Re: Cleaning a screen - use spray polish or microfibre? (10/21/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453297 (10/21/04)
- Re: Cool computing (10/21/04)
- Re: digest 2453296 (10/21/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453296 (10/21/04)
- Re: digest 2453292 (10/14/04)
- Re: Legitmate NG Post from Dave Tholen (10/14/04)
- Re: Legitmate NG Post from Dave Tholen (10/14/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453288 (10/11/04)
- Re: What is the Darkest Hour of the Night? (10/11/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/11/04)
- Re: Cool computing (10/11/04)
- Re: OS/2 Isn't it time to let it go and move on? (10/11/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/10/04)
- Re: Elizabot digest, volume 2453288 (10/10/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453288 (10/10/04)
- Re: digest 2453288 (10/10/04)
- Re: 2004 post mortem (10/08/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453286 (10/08/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: digest 2453286 (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/04/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/04/04)
- Re: digest 2453281 (10/04/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/04/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/04/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/04/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/04/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/04/04)
- Re: Picking-up the Euphonium after 8 years (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/03/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/03/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/03/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/03/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/03/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/03/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/02/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/02/04)
- Re: Picking-up the Euphonium after 8 years (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/02/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/02/04)
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/01/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/01/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453279 (10/01/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/01/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/01/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/01/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/01/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/01/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/01/04)
- Re: Re Bruce digest, volume 2453261 (10/01/04)
- Re: Sandman digest, volume 2453278 (10/01/04)
Michael Bruschkewitz
- Re: CreateProcess and Console Application (10/07/04)
- Re: CreateProcess and Console Application (10/01/04)
Michael Metcalf
- Re: Initialisation expression using overloaded intrinisic operator (10/31/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: Reading an array from a text file into fortran (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: Initialisation expression using overloaded intrinisic operator (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: interface with ifort compiler (10/20/04)
- Re: interface with ifort compiler (10/20/04)
- Re: Difference between EXTERNAL and INTERFACE (10/17/04)
- Text in Arabic? (10/17/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/15/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/14/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/13/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/12/04)
- Re: Fortran Compiler F77L - EM32 FORTRAN 77, version 5.20 (10/06/04)
- Re: a history question (10/01/04)
Michael Prager
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/06/04)
Michal Hajzman
- Fortran Compiler F77L - EM32 FORTRAN 77, version 5.20 (10/06/04)
Mike Walters
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
Mike Zulauf
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/25/04)
Mix1009
- Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
N. Shamsundar
- Re: read(5,*) problem? (10/05/04)
Nat
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/24/04)
- Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
Nightingale
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/02/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/01/04)
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/01/04)
- Re: Bruce (10/01/04)
orionlux
- graphics with g77 GNU fortran compiler (10/25/04)
Paul Van Delst
- Re: F2007: another possible improvement (10/29/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/29/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/28/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/28/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/28/04)
- Re: F2007 possible improvement (10/28/04)
- Re: Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/22/04)
- Re: ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/18/04)
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- Re: a history question (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/05/04)
Peng Yu
- What does MAIN_ _MAIN_ __MAIN__ mean?(to invoke clapack) (10/29/04)
Peter Flass
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
Peter Simon
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
Peter Weaver
- Re: a history question (10/06/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
Piantotardivo
- Algorittm.... (10/16/04)
Pierre Asselin
- Re: Reading signed binary file in FORTRAN (10/30/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
Prai Jei
- Re: Tholen Finally Admits that Substantiation is IRRELEVANT!!! (10/14/04)
Rich Townsend
- Re: Another more exotic method (10/31/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/27/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/21/04)
- Re: Help --- continued code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Exciting new feature for g95 (10/20/04)
- Re: Case sensitive arguments to coco text & copy mechanism (10/19/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Case sensitive arguments to coco text & copy mechanism (10/18/04)
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
- Re: overload array index operator (10/15/04)
- Re: Prediction from 50 years ago: Language of 2004 will be Fortran (10/15/04)
- Re: Upgrade to glibc 2.3.4 breaks Linux ifort binaries (10/13/04)
- Upgrade to glibc 2.3.4 breaks Linux ifort binaries (10/13/04)
- Re: Do any one know...... (10/07/04)
- Re: Lapack95, ifort and Intel MKL (10/07/04)
- Free, unsupported Intel MKL & VTune (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
Richard E Maine
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: Lahey on Fedora (10/28/04)
- Re: F2007 possible improvement (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/28/04)
- Re: Defined operation using an intrinsic (10/28/04)
- Re: Question about interfaces and structs (10/27/04)
- Re: aliased intent(in out) arguments (10/26/04)
- Re: Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/25/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/25/04)
- Re: ? open SVD f90 code (10/22/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Re: Help --- continued code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: interface with ifort compiler (10/20/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/20/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/19/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/19/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: f95 interpreter (10/18/04)
- Re: download fortran 4.0 power station (10/15/04)
- Re: allocatables arrays&subroutines (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: size of integer in g77 (10/13/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/12/04)
- Re: systemqq command in a DO loop (10/12/04)
- Re: fortran and mac (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- Re: open a file in a specific directory (10/07/04)
- Re: Reading data into a buffer (10/07/04)
- Re: Packed data ? (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/07/04)
- Re: a history question (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/06/04)
- Re: How to read a text file one character at a time? (10/05/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: SELECTED_REAL_KIND clarification plse (10/05/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/04/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/01/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: Garbage collection (Was: Re: a history question) (10/01/04)
- Re: Mixing Format Specification with parameters (09/30/04)
- Re: a history question (09/30/04)
Richard Edgar
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
Richard Maine
- Re: Reading Tab Separated Files (10/24/04)
- Re: Outputting Formatted data to file (10/22/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/20/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
Richard Steiner
- Re: OS/2 maximum hard drive HPFS partition size (10/01/04)
rih5342
- Re: Removing QuickWin (10/15/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
Robert Corbett
- Re: What does MAIN_ _MAIN_ __MAIN__ mean?(to invoke clapack) (10/30/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/17/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/16/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/14/04)
- Re: ALLOCATE and contiguous memory (10/13/04)
- Re: Sun F95 NaN's variable to negative exponent (10/06/04)
- Re: operator overloads and the Sun Fortran compiler 6.2 (10/01/04)
robin
- Re: F2003 and varying strings (10/29/04)
- Re: CreateProcess and Console Application (10/05/04)
- Re: CreateProcess and Console Application (10/04/04)
Robin Haunschild
- Re: g95 and do loops (10/11/04)
- g95 and do loops (10/08/04)
Roger Zemp
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin - similar problem (10/22/04)
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin - similar problem (10/22/04)
Ron G.
- Re: ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/20/04)
- ASCII and BINARY Write() (10/19/04)
Ross
- Re: digest 2453292 (10/14/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/06/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/05/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
Ryo Furue
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/23/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/22/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
Salvatore Filippone
- Re: TRANSFER() & friends (was Re: a history question) (10/05/04)
- TRANSFER() & friends (was Re: a history question) (10/04/04)
Sandra Barsky
- Question about interfaces and structs (10/27/04)
Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: mtprng or abs() problem; g95 (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: fortran with Java? (10/13/04)
Seth Pacha
- Re: Outputting Formatted data to file (10/25/04)
- Outputting Formatted data to file (10/22/04)
Simon
- Re: table interface for user input in windows (10/29/04)
- table interface for user input in windows (10/28/04)
Simon Geard
- Re: installing g95 under cygwin - similar problem (10/22/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/20/04)
Steve Lionel
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/29/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/22/04)
- Re: Outputting Formatted data to file (10/22/04)
- See Intel Software Development Tools at Supercomputing 2004 (10/22/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/19/04)
- Re: Any fortran 90/95 wizards out there? Need help (10/18/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/08/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/06/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/05/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/05/04)
- Re: MS Fortran 5.1 default storage sizes (10/04/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/04/04)
- Re: Allocatable arrays in thread safe code (10/01/04)
Steven G. Johnson
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/15/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/13/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
- Re: FFTW and ifort (10/12/04)
Stig Kildegard Andersen
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
Stig Kildeg�rd Andersen
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/30/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Reporting errors from pure subroutines/functions (10/29/04)
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/26/04)
- Re: How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- How does the intrinsic present work? (10/22/04)
- Re: Case sensitive arguments to coco text & copy mechanism (10/20/04)
- Re: Case sensitive arguments to coco text & copy mechanism (10/19/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/19/04)
- Case sensitive arguments to coco text & copy mechanism (10/18/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/17/04)
- Re: download fortran 4.0 power station (10/15/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: systemqq command in a DO loop (10/12/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/01/04)
- Allocatable arrays in thread safe code (10/01/04)
- Re: free Fortran 95 for Windows (G95) (10/01/04)
Stuart Gerchick
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: Help please with a small code conversion (10/22/04)
Tabon
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/03/04)
The OS/2 Guy
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Michael Baldwin Bruce? (10/04/04)
tholen_at_antispam.ham
- Re: CVF bug ? (10/07/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/04/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/03/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/01/04)
- CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/01/04)
Thomas Koenig
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: How to protectdat in fortran 90 modules (10/21/04)
- Re: g95 and do loops (10/08/04)
- Re: a history question (09/30/04)
Tim Prince
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/31/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/30/04)
- Re: Inlining functions using *CONTAINS* statement (10/26/04)
- Re: Maintaining a Dusty Deck (10/14/04)
- Re: Upgrade to glibc 2.3.4 breaks Linux ifort binaries (10/13/04)
- Re: weird I/O problem with g77 (10/12/04)
- Re: a history question (10/07/04)
- Re: G77 undefined reference to `MAIN__' (10/07/04)
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
TimC
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/30/04)
- Re: GNU Fortran 95: Opinions? (10/29/04)
- Re: [Beginner] advice needed (10/29/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/22/04)
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: Installing g95 on OS X (10/20/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/19/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/07/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/06/04)
Tobias Schlueter
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/12/04)
Tom Linden
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
Tom McGlynn
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
- Re: Common --- question (10/20/04)
Tom Micevski
- Re: logical operator in fortran 90 (10/20/04)
- Re: cvf/ide - colored keywords (10/05/04)
Tom Van Vleck
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
Toon Moene
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: gfortran vs. g95 (10/13/04)
- Re: Derived data types vs computation time (10/05/04)
- Re: a history question (10/02/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
TSH
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/22/04)
- Re: Which Compiler to Purchase (10/18/04)
tweet
- Re: Can't we get rid of: Tholen, Sandman, Bruce, Elizabot? (10/02/04)
- Re: CVF and ADVANCE='NO' (10/02/04)
Ushnish Basu
- Re: Free Version of dtrans-Routine? (10/06/04)
vinayrh
- Execution problem in Compaq Visual Studio 6.0 (10/01/04)
Vinny
- Re: I 've got a little problem with my g77!! (10/01/04)
Walt R
- Re: Best number crunching solution under $10,000 ? (10/26/04)
Walter Spector
- Re: F2007 possible improvement (10/31/04)
- Re: Which Fortran editor do you prefer to work with, in Linux? (10/21/04)
- Re: NEW_LINE() (10/02/04)
Weisberg
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/05/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/05/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Re: Mission-Critical Fortran (10/01/04)
- Mission-Critical Fortran (09/30/04)
William Clodius
- Re: 0.0**0 = ? (10/05/04)
ywr
- Re: What's wrong with my program?? About Module file. (10/04/04)
- What's wrong with my program?? About Module file. (10/04/04)
yyyiiinnnggg_at_yahoo.com
- Re: New Tholen LITS: Re: digest 2453293 (10/15/04)
Zorba.GR
- FileMaker Server 7, Filemaker Developer v7 WinALL Mac, Fujitsu NetCOBOL Suite v7.0L10 Enter. Edition, Intel Fortran Compiler Pro With IMSL V8.0.048, Clarion.v6.0.Enterprise.Edition.Incl, Capesoft.NetTalk.for.clarion.6.v3.04.Retail.WinAll, MicroSoft (10/28/04)
ZRT
- Will 'empty' dimensions affect performance ? (10/23/04)

Last message date: 10/31/04
Archived on: 10/31/04 CET

1103 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

comp.lang.fortranBy Author

comp.lang.fortran
By Author