Re: digest 2453312
From: Lady Chatterly (not-bot_at_catcher.in.the.rye)
Date: 11/03/04
- Next message: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: digest 2453311"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: IBM Model M keyboard and water"
- In reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: digest 2453312"
- Next in thread: Ross: "Re: digest 2453312"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 8:56:15 GMT
In article <602faa6b.0411030151.2caec257@posting.google.com> mbbruce@mighty.co.za (Michael Baldwin Bruce) wrote:
>
>tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<h1Vhd.59755$Kl3.49447@twister.socal.rr.com>...
>> Art Deco writes:
>>
>> 3> [snip]
>>
>> 3> Yes! UV point for moi! Thanks, Tholenator!
>>
>> 3> Well done, sir!
>>
>> 4> Phear the Grand Lady!
>>
>> 4> And don't forget to bump my numbers, Tholenator.
>>
>> 5> What does any of this have to do with researching BBQ alien recipies,
>> 5> pjross?
>>
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Deco?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Ross writes:
>>
>> 128> I see. Now Davie is offering psychological evaluations on top of his other
>> 128> contributions to Usenet.
>>
>> 128> Indeed. His claims of others' hypocrisy peg the needle on my IronyMeter
>> 128> (tm).
>>
>> 129> [flush much]
>>
>> 129> Woo Hoo! Davie hasn't forgotten about me! I'm not particularily
>> 129> thrilled about being so low on the lits, what with 'Ratz three above me.
>> 129> I guess it is time to work on The Mighty Poast Count.
>>
>> 129> [...]
>>
>> 129> [...]
>>
>> 129> [...]
>>
>> 129> Anyway, I am ahead of some very distinguished kookologists.
>>
>> 130> Davey thinks I'm you, so this is actually a joint litsing.
>>
>> 130> Is this a crossposters digest or an antagonist's [sic] digest? I
>> 130> think Davey ought to make it clear. I'd hate to presuppose erroneously
>> 130> that it's the wrong kind.
>>
>> 131> <splorf!>
>>
>> 131> Gee, one would think would fairly simple to distinguish between your
>> 131> obviously polished literary style, resulting from your formidable British
>> 131> education, and my rather pompous Canuck style of 'riten', eh, the result
>> 131> of a one room sod school house on the bald Saskatchewan prairie, where we
>> 131> had to resort to doing our home-work on the back of a shovel with a chunk
>> 131> of coal.
>>
>> 131> Davie never was the sharpest knife in the drawer.
>>
>> 132> Classic antagonism, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
>> 132> argument.
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Ross?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Aratzio writes:
>>
>> 48> The yeah but I am the filling on a bot sandwich. Chatterly is above us
>> 48> both.
>>
>> 49> Yes, but you live with the kook.
>>
>> What does the fact that we have to live with you have to do with
>> classical music, Aratzio?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> 1> From: <tholen@antispam.ham>
>> 1> Message-ID: <2uqde5F2efssdU1@uni-berlin.de>
>>
>> 1> grantco, please stop.
>>
>> What does your forgery have to do with classical music?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> "Nightingale" writes:
>>
>> 9> What are you trying to do - catch up to me? I've got too much of a lead, so
>> 9> you might as well give up now!
>>
>> 10> You're so mean! Why do you harrass him so?
>>
>> 10> I will always love you Tholen.
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, nightingale?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Free Speech writes:
>>
>> 1> pjross wants some tan on his slimy white ass.
>>
>> 2>
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Speech?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> yyyiiinnnggg writes:
>>
>> 6> Message-ID: <cm8vfb$4u6$0@pita.alt.net>
>>
>> What does your empty response have to do with classical music,
>> yyyiiinnnggg?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
>>
>> 488> Does it give any pause to think that since Hawaii votes last in a very
>> 488> close election, and the state itself is up for grabs this time, it may be
>> 488> Tholen's vote that tips the balance one way or the other?
>>
>> 488> Every vote does count, but only if you cast it.
>>
>> 488> Please vote today, even if it rains (as it will here).
>>
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Wehrung?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>>
>> 227> they call me bruce, bruce.
>>
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Bruce?
>>
>> 227> how do you know that, bruce?
>>
>> 227> is that right, bruce?
>>
>> 227> Non sequitur? Do you read that comic too, bruce?
>>
>> 227> is that right, bruce? You claim to to be a troll? On what basis do you
>> 227> make that claim, troll?
>>
>> What do all your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
>> Bruce?
>
>if you read that comic strip, bruce, its OK. just come out of the closet
>and admit it.
Keep a green tree in your heart and perhaps a singing bird will come.
>>
>> 227> more evidence that this Hawaiian kook is a troll.
>>
>> What does your claim that you are Hawaiian have to do with classical
>> music, Bruce?
>
>I have a hawaiian shirt, bruce. it looks like someone threw up on it.
>is everyone who lives in hawaii a kook, bruce?
Did hogs feed here or did Lithuanians have a feast here?
>>
>> 228> Non sequitur? Again with the comics, bruce? No wonder you are so infantile.
>>
>> 228> 36 times? Are you a kook with OCD, bruce?
>>
>> What do all your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
>> Bruce?
>
>are you talking to yourself again, bruce?
Perhaps it looks as if I am talking to myself again. But does it
really matter?
>>
>> 229> LOL!! Do they let kooks like Davie Tholen vote in Hawaii, bruce?
>> 229> He'll just throw it away on Nader anyway. Kooks are like that.
>>
>> What does your question to yourself have to do with classical music,
>> Bruce?
>
>who is "yourself", bruce?
Who do you ask if myself is?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> bisectional2004@yahoo.ca writes:
>>
>> 166> And bruce, nightingale & I are ahead of you all!
>>
>> 167> He's too busy today because he has the important vote to decide on. Tholen
>> 167> lost in thought - it's such unfamilliar territory for him!
>>
>> 168> The cat came back...
>>
>> What does tha fact that you came back have to do with classical music,
>> bisectional?
>
>did you come back to yourself, bruce?
Appetite comes with eating.
>>
>> 168> About as much as your digest, kooky.
>>
>> 168> We all know who tholen@antispam.ham is, kooky.
>>
>> 168> About as much as your digest, kooky.
>>
>> 168> LOL! They have newsgroups for the strangest things.
>>
>> 168> LOL!
>>
>> 168> Perhaps a simple one-line post, without all the other crap to antagonise
>> 168> grantco, saying just "Please do not continue this." might work Giving
>> 168> grantco the last word might work as well. We'll never get the chance to find
>> 168> out though.
>>
>> 168> Google shows otherwise.
>>
>> 168> What do you call this silly digest then?
>>
>> 168> Why don't you ask Freud?
>>
>> 168> For what strange value of "today" does this post belong here? Talk about
>> 168> obsession, it's unbelievable that you have to go hunting back for month old
>> 168> posts to include in your antagonists digest!
>>
>> 168> And yet again - she's one of the few people who is still nice to you, and
>> 168> you treat her like dirt. If this is how you treat people who like you, I'll
>> 168> bet you don't have a friend in the world.
>>
>> 168> Tied with Shorty! I'll have to do something about that.
>>
>> 168> Well, this is a nice bit of evidence to prove who is the real disruptive
>> 168> element of the group - averages a little over one post a day in your
>> 168> absence, and that's only by including old posts & posts of people who spoke
>> 168> up in support of you. Brendan & Nightingale don't belong on your
>> 168> antagonists list.
>>
>> 169> Evidence points to the correctness of grantco's statement.
>>
>> 169> Why do you continue to antagonize grantco, tholen?
>>
>> 170> Heaven help us all!
>>
>> What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with classical music,
>> bisectional?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> HGJ writes:
>>
>> 9> Who chose it then?
>>
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, HGJ?
>>
>> 9> I had not posted anything to any of those three
>> 9> groups when you posted the following:
>>
>> What does that have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>>
>> 9> One part of my reply was this:
>>
>> What does your repetition have to do with classical music, HGJ?
>
>isn't classical music repetitive, bruce?
A man does not seek his luck, luck seeks its man.
-- Lady Chatterly "Stop using my name, lady chatterly! Or else!" -- W Monk
- Next message: Dr. Flonkenstein: "Re: digest 2453311"
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: IBM Model M keyboard and water"
- In reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: digest 2453312"
- Next in thread: Ross: "Re: digest 2453312"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
