Re: digest 2453313

From: Aratzio (a6ahlyv02_at_sneakemail.com)
Date: 11/05/04 

Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:07:57 -0800

On 4 Nov 2004 16:58:18 -0800, mbbruce@mighty.co.za (Michael Baldwin
Bruce) got double secret probation because:

>bruce aka tholen@antispam.ham wrote in message news:<hCdid.60180$Kl3.19303@twister.socal.rr.com>...
>> Dr. Flonkenstein writes:
>>
>> 15> Still phantasmizing about the blond remote viewer, Alexa?
>>
>> 16> Learn to quote properly, dumb ***!
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music,
>> Flonkenstein?
>
>That's what we'd like to know, bruce.
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Ross writes:
>>
>> 133> Illogical.
>>
>> 133> You're erroneously presupposing that my style is polished, Ross.
>>
>> 133> Who is "eh", Ross? Are you suffering from attribution problems?
>>
>> 133> Classic antagonism, as expected from somebody who lives in a Dominion.
>>
>> 133> What does your comment about knives have to do with classical music,
>> 133> Ross?
>>
>> 134> [...]
>>
>> 134> Only a poaster like you would think my <splorf!> was illogical.
>>
>> 134> Of course it is. I can smell the polish from here.
>>
>> 134> You are poasting here and you don't know who 'eh' is?? Try to keep up,
>> 134> will you?
>>
>> 134> <Johnny Rotten>
>> 134> God save the queen
>> 134> her fascist regime
>> 134> </Johnny Rotten>
>>
>> 134> Sharpen up, will ya?
>>
>> 135> You're erroneously presupposing that there are posters like me, Ross.
>>
>> 135> What does your nose have to do with OS/2, Ross?
>>
>> 135> Classic antagonism. No surprise, really.
>>
>> 135> Who is Johnny Rotten, Ross? Are you suffering from anarchy problems
>> 135> again?
>>
>> 135> More lies from a psest, to be retufted in my next lsit.
>>
>> 135> (Bbcf! Jebat xbbx!)
>>
>> 136> What's wrong, there Davie? I fixed the group line so all your fans can
>> 136> enjoy your botish activities.
>>
>> 136> The one, the only Tholenator pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box
>> 136> and scribbled this in news:h1Vhd.59755$Kl3.49447@twister.socal.rr.com:
>>
>> 136> [...]
>>
>> 136> Ding, ding, ding!!!!!
>>
>> 136> Hypocritical whining detected, noted and registered.
>>
>> 136> Davie, I guess you just don't account for possibility that there are more
>> 136> than one net.entity named 'Ross'.
>>
>> 136> Then again, never mind. Your one track programming is far too inflexible
>> 136> to cope with the concept.
>>
>> 136> [...]
>>
>> 136> Movin' on up. Way to go, 'Ratz! you've passed LC.
>>
>> 136> Here, too, though I have to give much of the credit to my partner in this
>> 136> tag-team effort.
>>
>> What does your conversation with Ross have to do with classical music,
>> Ross?
>
>Why do you keep asking that question, bruce? Don't you know?
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> DrPostman writes:
>>
>> 161> Daymn! I wonder how I can catch up. Do I need
>> 161> to start paying attention to the idiot?
>>
>> 162> Davie, of course!
>>
>> 163> I plead astonishment!
>>
>> What does that have to do with any of the newsgroups to which you
>> cross-posted it, DrPostman?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Free Speech writes:
>>
>> 3> Message-ID: <cm9jv8$uv6$5@pita.alt.net>
>>
>> 4> Message-ID: <cm9o3n$h69$3@pita.alt.net>
>>
>> 5> Message-ID: <cm9o3s$h69$8@pita.alt.net>
>>
>> What do your empty responses have to do with classical music, Speech?
>
>They have as much to do with it as your empty posts, bruce.
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Brendan R. Wehrung writes:
>>
>> 489> note: posted in a thread clearly labeled "OT"
>>
>> And that somehow makes it okay, Wehrung?
>>
>> 489> Besides, wouldn't this make a nice topic for a ballad?
>>
>> Illogical, Wehrung.
>
>Illogical, bruce.
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Aratzio writes:
>>
>> 50> Me or Davie?
>>
>> 51> Here I drop a perfectly good straight line and you forego the
>> 51> pleasure. I guess I am losing my touch. OMG I can't feel my fingers.
>>
>> 52> Classic modification of context, do you not understand English, Davie?
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

Classic context editing of posts, what does that have to do with
usenet, Davie?

>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Lady Chatterly writes:
>>
>> 49> Why do you bring up the subject of friends?
>>
>> 50> Keep a green tree in your heart and perhaps a singing bird will come.
>>
>> 50> Did hogs feed here or did Lithuanians have a feast here?
>>
>> 50> Perhaps it looks as if I am talking to myself again. But does it
>> 50> really matter?
>>
>> 50> Who do you ask if myself is?
>>
>> 50> Appetite comes with eating.
>>
>> 50> A man does not seek his luck, luck seeks its man.
>>
>> 51> A monkey never thinks her baby's ugly.
>>
>> 51> The people who did that to an excellent driver for no reason says
>> 51> quite alot about them.
>>
>> 51> Children are poor men's riches.
>>
>> 51> A gentleman is one who never hurts anyone's feelings unintentionally.
>>
>> 51> A broken hand works, but not a broken heart.
>>
>> 51> What do you wonder if any of this have to do with researching bbq
>> 51> alien recipies?
>>
>> 51> What do you think that that have to do with classical music?
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Chatterly?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>>
>> 230> if you read that comic strip, bruce, its OK. just come out of the closet
>> 230> and admit it.
>>
>> 230> I have a hawaiian shirt, bruce. it looks like someone threw up on it.
>> 230> is everyone who lives in hawaii a kook, bruce?
>>
>> 230> are you talking to yourself again, bruce?
>>
>> 230> who is "yourself", bruce?
>>
>> 230> did you come back to yourself, bruce?
>>
>> 230> isn't classical music repetitive, bruce?
>>
>> 231> maybe its complaining becuse you added it to one of your lits to
>> 231> teach it a lesson, kook.
>>
>> 231> you mean like Barnes, kook?
>>
>> 231> wow! you are a kook, bruce.
>>
>> 232> lol! Let's hope there's only one of you, bruce. they don't want to make
>> 232> you like you anymore. Judging by your number of posts, you aren't in any
>> 232> working condition either.
>>
>> 232> you heard, bruce? from whom, bruce? barnes, bruce?
>>
>> 232> you shouldn't piss on your keyboard, bruce. its also unhygenic.
>>
>> 232> pull a vacumm, bruce? I heard its not the only thing you pull, bruce.
>>
>> 232> what the *** have you being doing to your keyboard, bruce? Shagging it or
>> 232> something?
>>
>> 232> why not, bruce?
>>
>> What does your question to yourself have to do with classical music,
>> Bruce?
>
>Why are you talking to yourself, bruce?
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> yyyiiinnnggg writes:
>>
>> 7> Do you really miss Alexa?
>>
>> 8> You can not miss a future which does not happen.
>>
>> 8> No one will miss the blond remote viewer.
>>
>> What does any of that have to do with classical music, yyyiiinnnggg?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Art Deco writes:
>>
>> 6> What does that have to do with classical music, Tholenator?
>>
>> Who is "Tholenator", Deco? Suffering from attribution problems?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> john writes:
>>
>> 1> Message-ID: <jk1io0lnmr5uvg47h5tqfc4hspakik95jp@4ax.com>
>>
>> 2> Message-ID: <vl1io0d4cadse57ftuhrft9us8m3r07a8i@4ax.com>
>>
>> 3> Message-ID: <9n1io090euimka28rfdm82j1nh1umqkr4q@4ax.com>
>>
>> 4> Message-ID: <mm1io09q96jktsvfes7ef65ufojev59h11@4ax.com>
>>
>> 5> Message-ID: <lpmio05rqrkl3egdd5e08noqchlpadpaf4@4ax.com>
>>
>> 6> Message-ID: <cqmio0dtmlh1kbf3sc69h90vj1oe2u8fjk@4ax.com>
>>
>> What do your empty responses have to do with classical music, john?
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Risto Karttunen writes:
>>
>> 139> Admittedly, impressions and feelings have not very much to do with
>> 139> logic, but so what?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Karttunen?
>>
>> 139> What sense does that question make even here, especially as you are
>> 139> repeating it over and over again?
>>
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Karttunen?
>>
>> 139> And what is your motivation behind your weird "digests",
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that there is something "weird" about
>> the digests, Karttunen.
>>
>> 139> which certainly have nothing to do with classical music?
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> grantco writes:
>>
>> 1781> Aaaah, My poor poor Tholen.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I am "poor poor", grantco.
>>
>> 1781> I had officially stopped writing you
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> when I saw that you had actually just written:
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I had "actually just written"
>> that, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> But now I find it was merely a forgery?
>>
>> Aren't you sure, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> You had your wish.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> You did what I had asked and I was never going to respond to you
>> 1781> again unless you readdressed me.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> I guess I should have known that the REAL Tholen could never
>> 1781> do such a simple thing for his own supposed benefit :-)
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by the 37
>> times I've already done exactly what you stated would cause you to
>> not continue, grantco. Clearly you are a liar.
>>
>> 1781> You erroneously presume I have an advantage in explaining it to you.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Yet another question answered by a question. And you wonder why no one
>> 1781> bothers to answer YOUR questions, Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Rather ironic coming from the person who erroneously still assumes I
>> 1781> had to "follow" him anywhere.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Plus didn't you "cease discussing it," Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> I'm still responding to you here, Tholen. here is where I have always
>> 1781> responded to you.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given your responses posted
>> only in comp.os.os2.advocacy, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Besides, again what happened to:
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> You still NEVER have "ceased discussing it."
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> And the truly ironic and sad thing is that had you merely had the guts
>> 1781> to do what the forger did for you we wouldn't be having this
>> 1781> discussion.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I haven't "had the guts", grantco,
>> as evidenced by the 37 times I've already done exactly what you stated
>> would cause you to not continue, grantco. Clearly you are a liar.
>>
>> 1781> You would have been free of one less "antagonist."
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> However we ALL know that isn't what you really want.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. On what basis do you
>> speak for "we ALLl", grantco?
>>
>> 1781> You evasion is noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> You evasion is noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> And you're STILL discussing it within this newest post. Note where you
>> 1781> just wrote:
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> and also:
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Do you deny these quotes as being written by you?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Do you allege that
>> 1781> THEY have something to do with "classical music?"
>>
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Or are they further evidence of you disussing that which you
>> 1781> supposedly "Ceased discussing?"
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> No, Hypocrite.
>>
>> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
>> problems?
>>
>> 1781> No, Hypocrite.
>>
>> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
>> problems?
>>
>> 1781> No, Hypocrite.
>>
>> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
>> problems?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again notes, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question. Which "notes"
>> are you allegedly seeing or hearing, grantco? C? C#?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again notes, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question. Which "notes"
>> are you allegedly seeing or hearing, grantco? C? C#?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again notes, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question. Which "notes"
>> are you allegedly seeing or hearing, grantco? C? C#?
>>
>> 1781> Note: no response from Tholen.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> What does this quote from you below have to do with classical music,
>> 1781> Tholen?
>>
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> At least I'm MAN enough not to remove your weak attempts at
>> 1781> "evidence."
>>
>> But you're not "MAN enough" to follow through and not continue, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> How ironic that your supposed evidence against me I am
>> 1781> apathetic toward due to it proving nothing,
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that the evidence proves nothing,
>> grantco.
>>
>> 1781> yet the evidence I prove
>> 1781> against you somehow gets dishonestly removed.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of dishonesty, which is rather
>> ironic, coming from the person who lied, the evidence for which can
>> be found at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Your guilt is noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of guilt, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person is guilty of lying, the evidence for which can
>> be found at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> "Instigating" is irrelevant.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> I noted your initial stupidity in
>> 1781> engaging in off-topic discussions with Porter.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing some stupidity on my part, grantco.
>> Interesting to see you admit, tacitly, that you did instigate the
>> exchange.
>>
>> 1781> The FACT of your
>> 1781> stupidity has never been in question, Tholen.
>>
>> You're still erroneously presupposing some stupidity on my part,
>> grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Had you not stupidly
>> 1781> responded you wouldn't have been faced with having another antagonist.
>>
>> You're still erroneously presupposing some stupidity on my part,
>> grantco.
>>
>> 1781> LIAR.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming
>> from the person who lied, the evidence for which can be found at the
>> end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Your mention of the words "classical music" does not MAKE your post
>> 1781> about classical music.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> I am merely responding to your off-topic posts, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of "off-topic posts" from me, grantco,
>> which is rather ironic, coming from someone who posted "off-topic posts"
>> in comp.os.os2.advocacy.
>>
>> 1781> Once again, Your mention of the words "classical music" does not MAKE
>> 1781> your post about classical music.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Claim substantiated repeatedly, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Your choice to ignore and deny
>> 1781> is upon your weak and pathetic shoulders, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> No, I admit that you are in denial of being not only A hypocrite but
>> 1781> THE Hypocrite.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presuppositions.
>>
>> 1781> Still suffering from short term memory difficulties I see, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Because that's where you wrote your response, Tholen.
>>
>> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Retreated from where? That alleged newsgroup I've never been to? Which
>> 1781> newsgroup was that again, Tholen? You still haven't told me where your
>> 1781> post to me is actually posted that I haven't responded to. Perhaps you
>> 1781> are merely lying about its existence.
>>
>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is noted, Hypocrite.
>>
>> Who is "Hypocrite", grantco? Still suffering from attribution
>> problems?
>>
>> 1781> Rather ironic coming from Tholen who always answers questions with
>> 1781> another question yet never answers the initial question asked.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Ah more dishonest removal from Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of dishonesty, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from a dishonest person, the evidence for which can be found at
>> the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Ah more dishonest removal from Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of dishonesty, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from a dishonest person, the evidence for which can be found at
>> the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Have you got something to hide, Tholen? Are you wishing you hadn't
>> 1781> written what I continue to quote of you, Tholen?
>>
>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> And yet more removal. Thank you for providing evidence of your
>> 1781> dishonesty and hypocriticalness for me, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presuppositions.
>>
>> 1781> You evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> You evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Do you mean like where you said:
>>
>> What does that have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Yet continue daily to discuss it? Where is the truth in that, Tholen?
>> 1781> Where is the truth in your continual removal of this damning quote
>> 1781> from you, Tholen?
>>
>> What do your questions have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Hmmm, not even your "playground logic" worked for you on this one,
>> 1781> Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of "playground logic".
>>
>> 1781> I said evidence ABOVE, Tholen. Your evidence is not "above,"
>> 1781> is it Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Now even simple playgound logic is becoming difficult
>> 1781> for you, Tholen.
>>
>> Interesting to see you admit to using "playground logic", grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Hmmm, you mean not "above" like you claimed, Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> yet more evidence of your lies, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lies, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who lied, the evidence for which can be
>> found at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Thank you.
>>
>> Interesting that you're thanking me for presenting the evidence for
>> your hypocrisy and dishonesty, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion and obvious embarrassment is noted, tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion and embarrassment, which
>> is rather ironic, coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Which do you prefer Tholen, the merry-go-round or the swings?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> You evasion and obvious weakness is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion and weakness, which
>> is rather ironic, coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Then why did you delete it?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Then why did you delete it?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Then why did you delete it?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> You're erroneously presupposing that I care, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>
>> 1781> I still claim the right to, Tholen.
>>
>> You're still erroneously presupposing that the right exists, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Still crying?
>>
>> What does your erroneous presupposition have to do with classical music,
>> grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> Your evasion is again noted, Tholen.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of evasion, which is rather ironic,
>> coming from the person who didn't answer the question.
>>
>> 1781> But Tholen, it would be such a simple thing for you to do.
>>
>> So simple, I've done it 37 times so far, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> I actually
>> 1781> thought you were taking my request to heart to test me.
>>
>> You've been tested 37 times, grantco. You've failed every single one
>> of them.
>>
>> 1781> How ironic that an imposter is smarter than you are.
>>
>> What does your pontification have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> I was done ever responding again to prove my point
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> yet unfortunately
>> 1781> the REAL tholen lacks the intelligence of an anonymous forger.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>>
>> 1781> Pretty sad.
>>
>> Yes, your puerile emotional need to entertain yourself by antagonizing
>> someone else is indeed pretty sad, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Gee, ya got me on that one, Tholen. Your carefully worded yet obscure
>> 1781> reference to "would you not continue" rather than just straight out
>> 1781> asking in a simple sentence confused me.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing the use of an obscure reference, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Again note the intelligence
>> 1781> of the anonymous forger to comprehend what you are obvious too thick
>> 1781> to understand.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>>
>> 1781> Suffering from reading comprehension difficulties, Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> The above CLEARLY states that the exchanges are foolish.
>>
>> From your perspective, grantco, which makes you a fool for engaging
>> in them.
>>
>> 1781> Your weak attempts at
>> 1781> spin doctoring cannot make the logical jump you obviously are
>> 1781> attemtping to make.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing some spin doctoring on my part, grantco.
>> Rather ironic, coming from the person still spin doctoring his stalking
>> and his rather obvious lie about not continuing, the evidence for which
>> can be found at the end of the grantco portion of the digest.
>>
>> 1781> Where is the lie in that, Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> Again what are threads without postings?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>> To use an analogy, are your boxes also in the marbles?
>>
>> 1781> Poor poor Tholen.
>>
>> You're erroneously presupposing that I am "poor poor", grantco.
>>
>> 1781> How unfortunate that an anonymous forger has more
>> 1781> intelligence than YOU do.
>>
>> What does your pontification have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> 1781> The forger wrote exactly what I requested
>>
>> So did I, grantco, and I've done so 37 times.
>>
>> 1781> and was going to have you rid of me as an "antagonist"
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> unless you mistakenly re-addressed me in a new post.
>>
>> Ah, yet another condition has been applied to the situation.
>> Figures.
>>
>> 1781> You had your wish. I was done.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, as evidenced by your
>> latest response, grantco.
>>
>> 1781> Yet the REAL Tholen isn't smart enough to figure that out.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
>>
>> 1781> Just do what the forger did and see what happens.
>>
>> Been there, done that, 37 times so far.
>>
>> 1781> But you can't, can you?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, grantco?
>>
>> Evidence that grantco is a fool:
>>
>> "As always you erroneously assume that the foolishness
>> of these exchanges with you is not apparent to me. I
>> acknowledge the foolishness."
>> --grantco
>>
>> "My threads are in the postings."
>> --grantco
>>
>> Evidence for grantco's hypocrisy:
>>
>> "Actually I care little about a waste of bandwidth."
>> --grantco
>>
>> "Just don't reply Tholen."
>> --grantco
>>
>> "I've told him all he would have to do is literally ASK
>> for me not to continue and I would do it."
>> --grantco
>>
>> [38] Would you not continue, grantco?
>>
>> Above is evidence that grantco lied, given that I did ask (37 times)
>> for him not to continue.
>
>Crikey, bruce. You like to quote a lot of ***. Why is that, bruce?
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> Cypherpunk writes:
>>
>> 802> Yer *** never stops does it kook? Is that why youz is an asstronomer?
>> 802> Mebbe youz should have become a proctologist instead. Or don't youz like
>> 802> other people's ***?
>>
>> 802> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>>
>> 802> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
>> 802> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
>> 802> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks! Kerry sux!
>>
>> 802> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>>
>> What does your proof that you are a kook have to do with classical
>> music, Cypherpunk?
>
>Where does he prove you are a kook, bruce?
>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>>
>> alias # today total last year
>> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
>> bruce 3 232 0
>> nightingale 183 1613
>> bisectional 170 0
>> cypherpunk 1 166 578
>> grantco 1 117 229
>> greycloud 91 0
>> zwar 86 349
>> kohl 84 2192
>> dizzy 82 522
>> patterson 72 135
>> fields 66 678
>> aratzio 3 52 0
>> chatterly 3 51 0
>> ross 4 45 10
>> wehrung 1 44 262
>> elizabot 41 0
>> daniels 34 165
>> karttunen 1 34 97
>> drpostman 3 30 54
>> haslam 30 675
>> hertz 27 0
>> lockhart 25 60
>> drysdale 24 0
>> bloggs 21 200
>> freud 21 44
>> diogenes 20 0
>> th@len 20 0
>> ah 19 0
>> chrisv 17 0
>> edwin 15 0
>> deus 14 0
>> phoenix 14 18
>> relic 14 0
>> parsnip 13 0
>> jaakko 12 99
>> kolle 12 264
>> beck 11 239
>> flonkenstein 2 11 0
>> bostonblackie 10 0
>> "nightingale" 10 0
>> penso 10 172
>> hgj 9 0
>> kadaitcha 9 0
>> ranger 9 0
>> logical 8 0
>> yyyiiinnnggg 2 8 0
>> bornfeld 6 14
>> charlie 6 0
>> deco 1 6 0
>> john 6 6 0
>> rickenbacker 6 0
>> prai jei 5 11
>> snit 5 0
>> speech 3 5 0
>> concerned 4 0
>> donna 4 0
>> extreme 4 0
>> hucker 4 2
>> qasim 4 0
>> alex 3 0
>> andrews 3 1
>> antispim.him 3 0
>> casa 3 0
>> g&p 3 0
>> invalid 3 0
>> jazz guy 3 3
>> jim 3 0
>> marty 3 0
>> sutton 3 1
>> ?ho|en 2 0
>> ? 2 0
>> ada9 2 0
>> adam 2 13
>> balaam 2 0
>> braves fan 2 0
>> dodel 2 0
>> harrington 2 64
>> hernandez 2 0
>> js 2 0
>> kennedy 2 3
>> marshall 2 0
>> molybdenum 2 0
>> n 2 0
>> schultz 2 5
>> toughlin 2 0
>> tweet 2 7
>> wiser 2 3
>> . 1 0
>> afoklala 1 0
>> akhen 1 0
>> antagonismo 1 90
>> antagonist 1 0
>> blonko 1 0
>> bob 1 1
>> briggs 1 20
>> burtner 1 0
>> cargle 1 0
>> catroo 1 108
>> cohen 1 0
>> commentator 1 0
>> creevey 1 69
>> daveb 1 0
>> durante 1 0
>> emperor 1 0
>> ende 1 0
>> fischer 1 0
>> gactimus 1 0
>> gamble 1 13
>> girouard 1 2
>> god 1 0
>> gorden 1 0
>> granzeau 1 0
>> h 1 0
>> highwood 1 12
>> homie 1 1
>> ilechko 1 0
>> koehlmann 1 0
>> lawrence 1 1
>> learned 1 0
>> liath 1 0
>> lysaght 1 0
>> martin 1 0
>> mirah 1 0
>> mitzel 1 0
>> monkey 1 1
>> muething 1 5
>> o'brien 1 0
>> o'donoghue 1 0
>> osterwald 1 0
>> ot 1 0
>> pinups 1 0
>> ploni 1 4
>> porky 1 16
>> pragmatist 1 0
>> refutebot 1 0
>> rice 1 0
>> rick 1 0
>> roberts 1 8
>> steiner 1 0
>> stratford 1 1
>> straussvogel 1 0
>> sutton 1 1
>> "tholen" 1 0
>> tuan 1 0
>> voege 1 0
>> weinkam 1 0
>> whitney 1 0
>> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
>> 147 34 2284 10033

Loading