Re: digest 2453316

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 11/07/04

  • Next message: Free Speech: "Re: digest 2453315"
    Date: 6 Nov 2004 23:14:39 -0800
    
    

    bruce aka tholen@antispam.ham the inquisitive wrote in message news:<v5bjd.36751$jo2.14721@twister.socal.rr.com>...
    > Art Deco writes:
    >
    > 7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 8> Classic antagonism, as expected from somebody who lacks a logical
    > 8> argument, Tholenator.
    >
    > Who is "Tholenator", Deco? Suffering from attribution problems?
    > And what does any of that have to do with classical music, deco?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > yyyiiinnnggg writes:
    >
    > 13> Message-ID: <cmh1rc$uk9$0@pita.alt.net>
    >
    > 14> Message-ID: <cmh2d8$1a7$0@pita.alt.net>
    >
    > What do your empty responses have to do with classical music,
    > yyyiiinnnggg?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
    >
    > 236> what is "the subject matter Wehrung", bruce?
    >
    > 236> like you are one to know, bruce.
    >
    > 236> you were breastfed thru falsies weren't you, bruce?
    >
    > 236> does this mean that nightingale had a bigger mouth last year than this year,
    > 236> bruce?
    >
    > 236> do you suffer from piles, bruce?
    >
    > 237> those apps probably don't like Barnes either, bruce.
    >
    > 237> lol!!!!! Wanker!
    >
    > 237> Which does about as much as pissing on your keyboard, bruce.
    >
    > 237> irrelevant and illogical, bruce.
    >
    > 238> you mean someone actually works there? Unlike you, bruce.
    >
    > 238> its sick of your stupid digests too. Lets hope it now beeps until
    > 238> the end of time.
    >
    > 238> ha, ha, ha! you idiot! lol
    >
    > 238> and nothing you say hold water.
    >
    > 238> ha, ha, ha! you must be joking! you might as well try and find someone
    > 238> who thinks OS/2 is a great operating system for running fortran programs.
    >
    > 239> golf on the moon, bruce? and here we were thinknig you spent your time
    > 239> examining Uranus.
    >
    > 239> illogical, bruce, given that you claim to program in fortran. this is a
    > 239> C program, not fortran. Ergo, you are an idiot.
    >
    > 240> you should not illegally pirate DVDs, bruce. you could get reported
    > 240> to the authorities for that.
    >
    > What do your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
    > Bruce?

    why doyou ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > HGJ writes:
    >
    > 10> I see that you didn't answer my question, Tholen.
    >
    > What does your question have to do with classical music, HGJ?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 10> About as much as your questions to me, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 10> About as much as your questions to Monica and Rowe, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 10> About as much as your questions to Monica and Rowe, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 10> About as much as much as your digest, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 10> About as much as much as your digest, Tholen.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Lady Chatterly writes:
    >
    > 55> And why do you have to find comfort in the many numbers of other like
    > 55> liars and pests here.
    >
    > 55> Perhaps it seems like I am a hacker. But that is not always the case.
    >
    > 55> Your grasp of the English language is appalling.
    >
    > 55> Perhaps it seems like I am responding to myself. But that is not
    > 55> always the case.
    >
    > 55> What I ask if any of that have to do with classical music?
    >
    > 55> Does it look to you like I do want to know who rexx is?
    >
    > 55> I was being a bit facetious myself.
    >
    > 55> Say wall eyed slave, whither wouldst thou convey this growing image of
    > 55> thy fiend like face?
    >
    > 55> Would you like to talk more about your dreams?
    >
    > 55> What do you ask if any of that have to do with classical music?
    >
    > Why are you responding to yourself, Chatterly?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Risto Karttunen writes:
    >
    > 142> My comment was about classical music, and you said 'classic illogic'.
    > 142> Why?
    >
    > Illogical, Karttunen; comments about classical music do not automatically
    > make them logical.
    >
    > 142> Irrelevant to this discussion, you mean?
    >
    > What does your question have to do with classical music, Karttunen?
    >
    > 142> But you have said that classical music isn't restricted to composers,
    > 142> works etc. Surely that includes Wagner and his operas. So, what else
    > 142> is there, in classical music, which is the topic of your digests?
    >
    > Non sequitur.

    Comic obsession noted, bruce.

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Cypherpunk writes:
    >
    > 808> Why do youz bother responding, kook?
    >
    > 808> Still sufferin' from stupidity problems, tholokook?
    > 808> Man, are youz one dumb asstronomer.
    >
    > 808> Man, even for an asstronomer, youz are dumb, davie tholoputz.
    >
    > 808> Namely youz, davie tholotroll.
    >
    > 808> Wow! Are youz way outa touch wid reality, davie tholodork.
    >
    > 808> What's dat? Go a hard on for Ross have youz, davie? Like I said,
    > 808> yer a latent homosexual.
    >
    > 808> Translation: davie tholo*** thinks he can spam the newsgroups and
    > 808> get away wid it along as he pretends he's not antagonizing everybody.
    >
    > 808> Yeah, like youz would ever be one, davie tholodork.
    >
    > 808> LOL!!! What a maroon. Davie tholodog - Ross's chewtoy!!!!
    >
    > 808> Just like all o yer *** is, davie tholokooky.
    >
    > 808> Note: no response. Classic evansion noted. Typical davie tholotroll ploy.
    >
    > 808> Still picking on Fartingale, davie tholo***?
    >
    > 808> Good! Eat my dust BS!
    >
    > 808> Man! Whata maroon!
    >
    > 808> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
    >
    > 808> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
    > 808> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
    > 808> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
    > 808> See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
    >
    > 808> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
    >
    > 809> Who? Youz and Tholen da kook?
    >
    > 809> Beats me! Its shoulda bin Fartingale anyways.
    >
    > 809> Typical woman. Gives up as soon as the going gets tough.
    >
    > 809> Yeah, we know youz are in love wid da kook. *** look how he treats youz
    > 809> like dirt. Its obvious he's a mysogynist with latent homosexual tendancies.
    > 809> His obsession wid my signature is a dead giveway. Plus the fact he's an
    > 809> asstronomer.
    >
    > 809> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
    >
    > 809> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
    > 809> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
    > 809> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
    > 809> See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
    >
    > 809> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
    >
    > What does your comment that you are a maroon have to do with classical
    > music, Cypherpunk?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Will Nelson writes:
    >
    > 1> You're proud that you're an obnoxious blowhard who can't gain attention other
    > 1> than by being an annoying, whiny queen?
    >
    > 1> Congrats.
    >
    > 1> How droll. A homosexual who likes to insert foreign objects in his anus.
    >
    > 1> Got gloryhole? Got AIDS!
    >
    > What do your responses to Cypherpunk have to do with classical music,
    > Nelson?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > bisectional2004@yahoo.ca writes:
    >
    > 171> What does any of that have to do with classical music, cypherpunk?
    >
    > I've already asked him that, bisectional.

    do you often state the obvious, bruce?

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > Ross writes:
    >
    > 138> The One, The Only, The Amazing, The Tholenator(tm) pulled
    > 138> a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
    > 138> news:nCSid.76758$Kl3.71928@twister.socal.rr.com:
    >
    > Who is "The Tholenator(tm)", Ross? Suffering from attribution problems?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> [snippage]
    >
    > Figures.

    what does, bruce?

    >
    > 138> It's your Usenet,
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
    >
    > 138> persona, Davie.
    >
    > Who are "persona" and "Davie", Ross? Still suffering from attribution
    > problems?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> Your responses are so predictable and
    > 138> formulaic you could be mistaken for a bot.
    >
    > How ironic, coming from someone whose responses are so predictable,
    > they demonstrate that you are a troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> One could devise a corollary to
    > 138> the Turing Test: if a (putative) human gives responses that are
    > 138> indistinguishable from those that would come from a bot, then the human is
    > 138> not showing intelligence, but is simply following deterministic algorithms.
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> How ironic, coming from someone who doesn't distinguish between 'Ross' and
    > 138> "Peter J. Ross'.
    >
    > Where is the alleged irony, Ross, other than the fact that you see
    > "Tholenator" where there is none.

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> On the contrary, your posting history, including this one, show a distinct
    > 138> lack of intelligence. For all we know, you could be a Python script
    > 138> running on a computer in Hawaii.
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> Your statement makes an unfounded assumption. But, that said, I may have
    > 138> mis-stated something in that sentence: by the age of 40, tying one's shoes
    > 138> is a repetitive activity that requires little, if any, creativity; if one
    > 138> thing can be said in your favour, Davie, is your love of repetition. You
    > 138> must be quite good at tying your shoes.
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> ....and I bet you love techno-dance music and Philip Glass's output, too.
    >
    > Non sequitur.
    >
    > 138> Oh goodie, Davie attempts a flame...and fails miserably.
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: you honestly want to raise your
    > 138> flaming skills. I would suggest hanging out in alt.hackers.malicious and
    > 138> rec.sport.pro-wrestling. Once your skills are up to par in those groups,
    > 138> you might try alt.flame; be aware, however, some of the regulars in a.f are
    > 138> extremely lame and should not be used as an example of 'those who flame
    > 138> well'. I'm glad I can help, even a little, in your quest to enter a flame.
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> Irony noted: Davie, the failed netkkkop, attempting to lecture others on
    > 138> netiquette. Hypocritical whining and stupidity detected, noted and
    > 138> registered.
    >
    > Where is the alleged irony, Ross, other than the fact that you see
    > "Davier" where there is none.

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> Note: the cinema is the cinema; the concert hall is the concert hall;
    > 138> neither is Usenet.
    >
    > Classic failure to comprehend the analogy.

    >
    > 138> For you that is a good thing in that if you tried your
    > 138> behaviour during the slow movement of Mahler 3, you would have quite a few
    > 138> fellow concert goers telling you to shut the fsck up.
    >
    > I'm not the one who wrote:
    >
    > "I choose to have a conversation where I wish on Usenet, with
    > whomever I wish."
    > --Ross
    >
    > which proves that you have no respect for netiquette, Ross.
    >
    > 138> Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
    >
    > What does your laugh have to do with classical music, Ross?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> '...it's not just a river in Egypt, it's Davie's mind set...."
    >
    > Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
    >
    > 138> Woof!
    >
    > What does your bark have to do with classical music, Ross?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> It is directly connected to a dude with the name of Wolfgang. I'm one of
    > 138> his crew.
    >
    > Non sequitur.
    >
    > 138> Classic evasion of the question.
    >
    > What does your question have to do with classical music, Ross?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> Admission that you bore your students noted.
    >
    > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
    > reading comprehension problems, Ross?

    why do you ask, bruce?

    >
    > 138> [...]
    >
    > Figures.
    >
    > 138> Right behind you 'Ratz, but LC is surging.
    >
    > Non sequitur.

    comic obsession noted again.

    >
    > ===========================================================================
    >
    > alias # today total last year
    > -------------- ------- ----- ---------
    > bruce 5 240 0
    > nightingale 184 1613
    > cypherpunk 2 173 578
    > bisectional 1 171 0
    > grantco 118 229
    > greycloud 91 0
    > zwar 86 349
    > kohl 84 2192
    > dizzy 82 522
    > patterson 72 135
    > fields 66 678
    > chatterly 1 55 0
    > aratzio 53 0
    > ross 1 47 10
    > wehrung 45 262
    > elizabot 41 0
    > karttunen 1 37 97
    > daniels 34 165
    > drpostman 30 54
    > haslam 30 675
    > hertz 27 0
    > lockhart 25 60
    > drysdale 24 0
    > bloggs 21 200
    > freud 21 44
    > diogenes 20 0
    > th@len 20 0
    > ah 19 0
    > chrisv 17 0
    > edwin 15 0
    > deus 14 0
    > phoenix 14 18
    > relic 14 0
    > yyyiiinnnggg 2 14 0
    > parsnip 13 0
    > jaakko 12 99
    > kolle 12 264
    > beck 11 239
    > flonkenstein 11 0
    > bostonblackie 10 0
    > hgj 1 10 0
    > "nightingale" 10 0
    > penso 10 172
    > kadaitcha 9 0
    > ranger 9 0
    > deco 2 8 0
    > logical 8 0
    > john 7 0
    > bornfeld 6 14
    > charlie 6 0
    > rickenbacker 6 0
    > prai jei 5 11
    > snit 5 0
    > speech 5 0
    > concerned 4 0
    > donna 4 0
    > extreme 4 0
    > hucker 4 2
    > qasim 4 0
    > alex 3 0
    > andrews 3 1
    > antispim.him 3 0
    > casa 3 0
    > g&p 3 0
    > invalid 3 0
    > jazz guy 3 3
    > jim 3 0
    > marty 3 0
    > sutton 3 1
    > ?ho|en 2 0
    > ? 2 0
    > ada9 2 0
    > adam 2 13
    > balaam 2 0
    > braves fan 2 0
    > dodel 2 0
    > harrington 2 64
    > hernandez 2 0
    > js 2 0
    > kennedy 2 3
    > marshall 2 0
    > molybdenum 2 0
    > n 2 0
    > schultz 2 5
    > toughlin 2 0
    > tweet 2 7
    > wiser 2 3
    > . 1 0
    > afoklala 1 0
    > akhen 1 0
    > antagonismo 1 90
    > antagonist 1 0
    > blonko 1 0
    > bob 1 1
    > briggs 1 20
    > burtner 1 0
    > cargle 1 0
    > catroo 1 108
    > cohen 1 0
    > commentator 1 0
    > creevey 1 69
    > daveb 1 0
    > durante 1 0
    > emperor 1 0
    > ende 1 0
    > fischer 1 0
    > gactimus 1 0
    > gamble 1 13
    > girouard 1 2
    > god 1 0
    > gorden 1 0
    > granzeau 1 0
    > h 1 0
    > highwood 1 12
    > homie 1 1
    > ilechko 1 0
    > koehlmann 1 0
    > lawrence 1 1
    > learned 1 0
    > liath 1 0
    > lysaght 1 0
    > martin 1 0
    > mirah 1 0
    > mitzel 1 0
    > monkey 1 1
    > muething 1 5
    > nelson 1 1 0
    > o'brien 1 0
    > o'donoghue 1 0
    > osterwald 1 0
    > ot 1 0
    > pinups 1 0
    > ploni 1 4
    > porky 1 16
    > pragmatist 1 0
    > refutebot 1 0
    > rice 1 0
    > rick 1 0
    > roberts 1 8
    > steiner 1 0
    > stratford 1 1
    > straussvogel 1 0
    > sutton 1 1
    > "tholen" 1 0
    > tuan 1 0
    > ugly bob 1 0
    > voege 1 0
    > weinkam 1 0
    > whitney 1 0
    > -------------- ------- ----- ---------
    > 149 17 2325 10033

    why are you so inquisitive, bruce? Why do you ask but never answer, bruce?
    are you a hypocrit, bruce?


  • Next message: Free Speech: "Re: digest 2453315"
  • Quantcast