Re: digest 2453316
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 11/07/04
- Previous message: Nicolas Riesz: "Fortran links"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Art Deco: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Son of Kit: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Son of Kit: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 6 Nov 2004 23:14:39 -0800
bruce aka tholen@antispam.ham the inquisitive wrote in message news:<v5bjd.36751$jo2.14721@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> Art Deco writes:
>
> 7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 8> Classic antagonism, as expected from somebody who lacks a logical
> 8> argument, Tholenator.
>
> Who is "Tholenator", Deco? Suffering from attribution problems?
> And what does any of that have to do with classical music, deco?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> yyyiiinnnggg writes:
>
> 13> Message-ID: <cmh1rc$uk9$0@pita.alt.net>
>
> 14> Message-ID: <cmh2d8$1a7$0@pita.alt.net>
>
> What do your empty responses have to do with classical music,
> yyyiiinnnggg?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:
>
> 236> what is "the subject matter Wehrung", bruce?
>
> 236> like you are one to know, bruce.
>
> 236> you were breastfed thru falsies weren't you, bruce?
>
> 236> does this mean that nightingale had a bigger mouth last year than this year,
> 236> bruce?
>
> 236> do you suffer from piles, bruce?
>
> 237> those apps probably don't like Barnes either, bruce.
>
> 237> lol!!!!! Wanker!
>
> 237> Which does about as much as pissing on your keyboard, bruce.
>
> 237> irrelevant and illogical, bruce.
>
> 238> you mean someone actually works there? Unlike you, bruce.
>
> 238> its sick of your stupid digests too. Lets hope it now beeps until
> 238> the end of time.
>
> 238> ha, ha, ha! you idiot! lol
>
> 238> and nothing you say hold water.
>
> 238> ha, ha, ha! you must be joking! you might as well try and find someone
> 238> who thinks OS/2 is a great operating system for running fortran programs.
>
> 239> golf on the moon, bruce? and here we were thinknig you spent your time
> 239> examining Uranus.
>
> 239> illogical, bruce, given that you claim to program in fortran. this is a
> 239> C program, not fortran. Ergo, you are an idiot.
>
> 240> you should not illegally pirate DVDs, bruce. you could get reported
> 240> to the authorities for that.
>
> What do your questions to yourself have to do with classical music,
> Bruce?
why doyou ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> HGJ writes:
>
> 10> I see that you didn't answer my question, Tholen.
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, HGJ?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 10> About as much as your questions to me, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 10> About as much as your questions to Monica and Rowe, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 10> About as much as your questions to Monica and Rowe, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 10> About as much as much as your digest, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 10> About as much as much as your digest, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Lady Chatterly writes:
>
> 55> And why do you have to find comfort in the many numbers of other like
> 55> liars and pests here.
>
> 55> Perhaps it seems like I am a hacker. But that is not always the case.
>
> 55> Your grasp of the English language is appalling.
>
> 55> Perhaps it seems like I am responding to myself. But that is not
> 55> always the case.
>
> 55> What I ask if any of that have to do with classical music?
>
> 55> Does it look to you like I do want to know who rexx is?
>
> 55> I was being a bit facetious myself.
>
> 55> Say wall eyed slave, whither wouldst thou convey this growing image of
> 55> thy fiend like face?
>
> 55> Would you like to talk more about your dreams?
>
> 55> What do you ask if any of that have to do with classical music?
>
> Why are you responding to yourself, Chatterly?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Risto Karttunen writes:
>
> 142> My comment was about classical music, and you said 'classic illogic'.
> 142> Why?
>
> Illogical, Karttunen; comments about classical music do not automatically
> make them logical.
>
> 142> Irrelevant to this discussion, you mean?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Karttunen?
>
> 142> But you have said that classical music isn't restricted to composers,
> 142> works etc. Surely that includes Wagner and his operas. So, what else
> 142> is there, in classical music, which is the topic of your digests?
>
> Non sequitur.
Comic obsession noted, bruce.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Cypherpunk writes:
>
> 808> Why do youz bother responding, kook?
>
> 808> Still sufferin' from stupidity problems, tholokook?
> 808> Man, are youz one dumb asstronomer.
>
> 808> Man, even for an asstronomer, youz are dumb, davie tholoputz.
>
> 808> Namely youz, davie tholotroll.
>
> 808> Wow! Are youz way outa touch wid reality, davie tholodork.
>
> 808> What's dat? Go a hard on for Ross have youz, davie? Like I said,
> 808> yer a latent homosexual.
>
> 808> Translation: davie tholo*** thinks he can spam the newsgroups and
> 808> get away wid it along as he pretends he's not antagonizing everybody.
>
> 808> Yeah, like youz would ever be one, davie tholodork.
>
> 808> LOL!!! What a maroon. Davie tholodog - Ross's chewtoy!!!!
>
> 808> Just like all o yer *** is, davie tholokooky.
>
> 808> Note: no response. Classic evansion noted. Typical davie tholotroll ploy.
>
> 808> Still picking on Fartingale, davie tholo***?
>
> 808> Good! Eat my dust BS!
>
> 808> Man! Whata maroon!
>
> 808> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 808> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 808> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 808> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
> 808> See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
>
> 808> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> 809> Who? Youz and Tholen da kook?
>
> 809> Beats me! Its shoulda bin Fartingale anyways.
>
> 809> Typical woman. Gives up as soon as the going gets tough.
>
> 809> Yeah, we know youz are in love wid da kook. *** look how he treats youz
> 809> like dirt. Its obvious he's a mysogynist with latent homosexual tendancies.
> 809> His obsession wid my signature is a dead giveway. Plus the fact he's an
> 809> asstronomer.
>
> 809> Freddie D. '***' Shorts
>
> 809> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> 809> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> 809> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
> 809> See, I told youz Kerry sux! Man, what a loser!
>
> 809> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
>
> What does your comment that you are a maroon have to do with classical
> music, Cypherpunk?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Will Nelson writes:
>
> 1> You're proud that you're an obnoxious blowhard who can't gain attention other
> 1> than by being an annoying, whiny queen?
>
> 1> Congrats.
>
> 1> How droll. A homosexual who likes to insert foreign objects in his anus.
>
> 1> Got gloryhole? Got AIDS!
>
> What do your responses to Cypherpunk have to do with classical music,
> Nelson?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> bisectional2004@yahoo.ca writes:
>
> 171> What does any of that have to do with classical music, cypherpunk?
>
> I've already asked him that, bisectional.
do you often state the obvious, bruce?
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Ross writes:
>
> 138> The One, The Only, The Amazing, The Tholenator(tm) pulled
> 138> a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
> 138> news:nCSid.76758$Kl3.71928@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
> Who is "The Tholenator(tm)", Ross? Suffering from attribution problems?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> [snippage]
>
> Figures.
what does, bruce?
>
> 138> It's your Usenet,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> 138> persona, Davie.
>
> Who are "persona" and "Davie", Ross? Still suffering from attribution
> problems?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> Your responses are so predictable and
> 138> formulaic you could be mistaken for a bot.
>
> How ironic, coming from someone whose responses are so predictable,
> they demonstrate that you are a troll, Ross.
>
> 138> One could devise a corollary to
> 138> the Turing Test: if a (putative) human gives responses that are
> 138> indistinguishable from those that would come from a bot, then the human is
> 138> not showing intelligence, but is simply following deterministic algorithms.
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> How ironic, coming from someone who doesn't distinguish between 'Ross' and
> 138> "Peter J. Ross'.
>
> Where is the alleged irony, Ross, other than the fact that you see
> "Tholenator" where there is none.
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> On the contrary, your posting history, including this one, show a distinct
> 138> lack of intelligence. For all we know, you could be a Python script
> 138> running on a computer in Hawaii.
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> Your statement makes an unfounded assumption. But, that said, I may have
> 138> mis-stated something in that sentence: by the age of 40, tying one's shoes
> 138> is a repetitive activity that requires little, if any, creativity; if one
> 138> thing can be said in your favour, Davie, is your love of repetition. You
> 138> must be quite good at tying your shoes.
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> ....and I bet you love techno-dance music and Philip Glass's output, too.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 138> Oh goodie, Davie attempts a flame...and fails miserably.
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: you honestly want to raise your
> 138> flaming skills. I would suggest hanging out in alt.hackers.malicious and
> 138> rec.sport.pro-wrestling. Once your skills are up to par in those groups,
> 138> you might try alt.flame; be aware, however, some of the regulars in a.f are
> 138> extremely lame and should not be used as an example of 'those who flame
> 138> well'. I'm glad I can help, even a little, in your quest to enter a flame.
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> Irony noted: Davie, the failed netkkkop, attempting to lecture others on
> 138> netiquette. Hypocritical whining and stupidity detected, noted and
> 138> registered.
>
> Where is the alleged irony, Ross, other than the fact that you see
> "Davier" where there is none.
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> Note: the cinema is the cinema; the concert hall is the concert hall;
> 138> neither is Usenet.
>
> Classic failure to comprehend the analogy.
>
> 138> For you that is a good thing in that if you tried your
> 138> behaviour during the slow movement of Mahler 3, you would have quite a few
> 138> fellow concert goers telling you to shut the fsck up.
>
> I'm not the one who wrote:
>
> "I choose to have a conversation where I wish on Usenet, with
> whomever I wish."
> --Ross
>
> which proves that you have no respect for netiquette, Ross.
>
> 138> Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
>
> What does your laugh have to do with classical music, Ross?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> '...it's not just a river in Egypt, it's Davie's mind set...."
>
> Further proof that you are troll, Ross.
>
> 138> Woof!
>
> What does your bark have to do with classical music, Ross?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> It is directly connected to a dude with the name of Wolfgang. I'm one of
> 138> his crew.
>
> Non sequitur.
>
> 138> Classic evasion of the question.
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Ross?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> Admission that you bore your students noted.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
> reading comprehension problems, Ross?
why do you ask, bruce?
>
> 138> [...]
>
> Figures.
>
> 138> Right behind you 'Ratz, but LC is surging.
>
> Non sequitur.
comic obsession noted again.
>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 5 240 0
> nightingale 184 1613
> cypherpunk 2 173 578
> bisectional 1 171 0
> grantco 118 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> kohl 84 2192
> dizzy 82 522
> patterson 72 135
> fields 66 678
> chatterly 1 55 0
> aratzio 53 0
> ross 1 47 10
> wehrung 45 262
> elizabot 41 0
> karttunen 1 37 97
> daniels 34 165
> drpostman 30 54
> haslam 30 675
> hertz 27 0
> lockhart 25 60
> drysdale 24 0
> bloggs 21 200
> freud 21 44
> diogenes 20 0
> th@len 20 0
> ah 19 0
> chrisv 17 0
> edwin 15 0
> deus 14 0
> phoenix 14 18
> relic 14 0
> yyyiiinnnggg 2 14 0
> parsnip 13 0
> jaakko 12 99
> kolle 12 264
> beck 11 239
> flonkenstein 11 0
> bostonblackie 10 0
> hgj 1 10 0
> "nightingale" 10 0
> penso 10 172
> kadaitcha 9 0
> ranger 9 0
> deco 2 8 0
> logical 8 0
> john 7 0
> bornfeld 6 14
> charlie 6 0
> rickenbacker 6 0
> prai jei 5 11
> snit 5 0
> speech 5 0
> concerned 4 0
> donna 4 0
> extreme 4 0
> hucker 4 2
> qasim 4 0
> alex 3 0
> andrews 3 1
> antispim.him 3 0
> casa 3 0
> g&p 3 0
> invalid 3 0
> jazz guy 3 3
> jim 3 0
> marty 3 0
> sutton 3 1
> ?ho|en 2 0
> ? 2 0
> ada9 2 0
> adam 2 13
> balaam 2 0
> braves fan 2 0
> dodel 2 0
> harrington 2 64
> hernandez 2 0
> js 2 0
> kennedy 2 3
> marshall 2 0
> molybdenum 2 0
> n 2 0
> schultz 2 5
> toughlin 2 0
> tweet 2 7
> wiser 2 3
> . 1 0
> afoklala 1 0
> akhen 1 0
> antagonismo 1 90
> antagonist 1 0
> blonko 1 0
> bob 1 1
> briggs 1 20
> burtner 1 0
> cargle 1 0
> catroo 1 108
> cohen 1 0
> commentator 1 0
> creevey 1 69
> daveb 1 0
> durante 1 0
> emperor 1 0
> ende 1 0
> fischer 1 0
> gactimus 1 0
> gamble 1 13
> girouard 1 2
> god 1 0
> gorden 1 0
> granzeau 1 0
> h 1 0
> highwood 1 12
> homie 1 1
> ilechko 1 0
> koehlmann 1 0
> lawrence 1 1
> learned 1 0
> liath 1 0
> lysaght 1 0
> martin 1 0
> mirah 1 0
> mitzel 1 0
> monkey 1 1
> muething 1 5
> nelson 1 1 0
> o'brien 1 0
> o'donoghue 1 0
> osterwald 1 0
> ot 1 0
> pinups 1 0
> ploni 1 4
> porky 1 16
> pragmatist 1 0
> refutebot 1 0
> rice 1 0
> rick 1 0
> roberts 1 8
> steiner 1 0
> stratford 1 1
> straussvogel 1 0
> sutton 1 1
> "tholen" 1 0
> tuan 1 0
> ugly bob 1 0
> voege 1 0
> weinkam 1 0
> whitney 1 0
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> 149 17 2325 10033
why are you so inquisitive, bruce? Why do you ask but never answer, bruce?
are you a hypocrit, bruce?
- Previous message: Nicolas Riesz: "Fortran links"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Art Deco: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Son of Kit: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Maybe reply: Son of Kit: "Re: digest 2453316"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]