Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Victor Eijkhout (see.sig_at_for.addy)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: James Giles: "Re: Host association and derived type component names"
- Previous message: James Van Buskirk: "Re: Are procedure dummy arguments ignored in generic procedure resolution?"
- In reply to: Michael Hosea: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:59:32 -0500
Michael Hosea <mhosea@mathworks.com> wrote:
Very interesting response. Thanks.
I'm not sure that what we're doing right now is going to help you any.
However, Lapack has traditionally had a very clean coding style with
rigidly enforced style, so I imagine that translating automatically will
always stay a possibility.
V.
-- email: lastname at cs utk edu homepage: www cs utk edu tilde lastname
- Next message: James Giles: "Re: Host association and derived type component names"
- Previous message: James Van Buskirk: "Re: Are procedure dummy arguments ignored in generic procedure resolution?"
- In reply to: Michael Hosea: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Mark McIntyre: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
