Re: Who uses clapack?
From: Victor Eijkhout (see.sig_at_for.addy)
Date: 12/11/04
- Next message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Rich Townsend: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:51:09 -0500
Jentje Goslinga <goslinga@telus.net> wrote:
> No dynamic memory allocation but the eternal WORK and IWORK
> arrays which are partitioned up in intricate ways.
> Does Lapack really need to cater to prehistorical compilers
> which do not support dynamic memory allocation?
Ok, it's clear where this use of temporaries comes from. However, it's
not clear that dynamic allocation is the best solution. If your routine
is called once, with a large dataset, then it could do its own
alloation. However, if the routine is called a large number of times
with the same small problem size, then you want to do the allocation
outside it.
We probably have to take a step back to the application level, and see
which routines can be part of a computationally intensive inner loop.
Your comments very much appreciated.
V.
-- email: lastname at cs utk edu homepage: www cs utk edu tilde lastname
- Next message: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Previous message: Rich Townsend: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Next in thread: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Reply: bv: "Re: Who uses clapack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|