Re: question on the svd
From: Ian Bush (I.J.Bush_at_nospam.dl.ac.uk)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: FCC: "Re: Newbie at school learning fortran...SOS"
- Previous message: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Once again..."
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: question on the svd"
- Next in thread: Rich Townsend: "Re: question on the svd"
- Reply: Rich Townsend: "Re: question on the svd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:54:22 +0000
Jentje Goslinga wrote:
> This is not really any different from the symmetric eigenvalue
> problem where eigenvectors are also determined up to a
> multiplication by -1.
>
More strictly for all normalised eigenvectors that correspond
to non-degenerate eigenvalues they are determined up to a factor
k, where k * CONJG( k ) = 1. When there are degeneracies any linear
combination of the evecs that correspond to the degenerate evals is
also an evec,
Ian
- Next message: FCC: "Re: Newbie at school learning fortran...SOS"
- Previous message: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Once again..."
- In reply to: Jentje Goslinga: "Re: question on the svd"
- Next in thread: Rich Townsend: "Re: question on the svd"
- Reply: Rich Townsend: "Re: question on the svd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]