Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC
From: Merrill & Michele (beckjensen_at_comcast.net)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Ron Shepard: "Re: Select case restrictions"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: Select case restrictions"
- In reply to: JS: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Next in thread: Victor Bazarov: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Reply: Victor Bazarov: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:14:34 -0600
"JS" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:e8o1s0t43aemputvbudau75v4rbp0nn8sd@4ax.com...
> Sorry, I hasn't been able to create a small program that demonstrates
> the problem.
>
> >
> >Can you create a small program that demonstrates the problem? Perhaps a
> >little summation loop or something. With a particular example it would be
> >possible to pin down the source of any inconsistency.
Does the Standard have anything to say about machine epsilon? MPJ
- Next message: Ron Shepard: "Re: Select case restrictions"
- Previous message: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: Select case restrictions"
- In reply to: JS: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Next in thread: Victor Bazarov: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Reply: Victor Bazarov: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: small numerical differences in floating point result between wintel and Sun/SPARC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
