Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran
From: Aardpig (aardpig_at_nospam)
Date: 02/06/05
- Next message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Previous message: Aardpig: "Re: Newbie Question about Fortran speed"
- In reply to: Gerald F. Thomas: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:01:16 -0500
Gerald F. Thomas wrote:
<snip>
> It's been standard CVF support recommendation that .lib generation and
> distribution be favored over the use of a .def. This is poor advise which
> MSVF never promoted.
>
"advice", not "advise". You under-educated arse-fart.
- Next message: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Previous message: Aardpig: "Re: Newbie Question about Fortran speed"
- In reply to: Gerald F. Thomas: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Next in thread: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Reply: beliavsky_at_aol.com: "Re: Building DLLs with Compaq Visual Fortran and Intel Visual Fortran"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|