Re: facts?

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 02/19/05


Date: 19 Feb 2005 02:02:55 -0800

Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Nightingale writes:
>
> > Michael Haslam wrote:
>
> >> Facts without humanity, art, or wit are worthless, tholentwat.
>
> > Why do you say that?
>
> Haslam said that to be antagonistic, Nightingale. He, ironically,
has
> not learned from his Usenet experience.

Is that a fact, Bruce? How ironic.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trolls & other things...
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... > comprehension skills, Nightingale. ... Classic antagonism, as expected from an arsehole to like to ... your posts ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Trolls & other things...
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... and wit ... > Haslam hasn't been interested in the truth, Nightingale. ... What does your classic antagonism, laced with invective, have to do ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Trolls & other things...
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... > What I think Michael was pouncing on is irrelevant, Nightingale ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Trolls & other things...
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... > Because he didn't post the truth, Nightingale. ... What does your antagonism have to do with classical music, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: digest, volume 2453426
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... >> have no clue, tholen. ... Haslam. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)