Re: digest, volume 2453426

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 02/28/05 

Date: 27 Feb 2005 23:55:01 -0800

Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Michael Haslam writes:
>
> >>>>>>>> Sacqueboutier writes:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Good grief. He's still at it.
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, Art Deco has posted over 300 antagonistic and
hypocritical
> >>>>>>>> articles in just the last 40 days. Do you suppose he'll
stop now
> >>>>>>>> that he's reached the top of the list of biggest disrupters
of the
> >>>>>>>> newsgroup?
>
> >>>>>>> You're the biggest disrupter of the froup, tholen.
>
> >>>>>> What's a "froup", Haslam?
>
> >>>>> The oldest, bestknown, and mostused Usenet typo. Get a clue,
tholen.
>
> >>>> Illogical, given that one cannot disrupt a typo, Haslam. Get a
clue,
> >>>> Haslam.
>
> >>> Illogical, given that a word can be described without reference
to its
> >>> meaning, tholen. Get a clue.
>
> >> Non sequitur, given that you were talking about the biggest
disrupter,
> >> Haslam. Get a clue, Haslam.
>
> > If you can't work out what froup means in the context in which I
used
> > it, particularly after my answer to your enquiry, you most
certainly
> > have no clue, tholen.
>
> If you can't understand that one cannot disrupt a typo, you most
> certainly have no clue, Haslam.
>
> > OTOH you might be the biggest antagonist of all time.
>
> Or I might not be, Haslam. In fact, I am not, given that you are a
> far bigger antagonist, Haslam.

Classic "mispelling", Bruce.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: digest, volume 2453426
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... >> have no clue, tholen. ... Haslam. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: facts?
    ... Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote: ... > Haslam said that to be antagonistic, Nightingale. ... > not learned from his Usenet experience. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)