Re: Trolls & other things...

From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 03/06/05 

Date: 6 Mar 2005 00:36:02 -0800

Bruce aKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Nightingale writes:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The quickest way to make them go away, is to starve them.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that people like Joe
Malloy will go
> >>>>>>>>>> away if they aren't fed, Patterson.
>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what you are trying to prove by bringing up
that name.
> >>>>>>>>> There has not been a post here by Joe Malloy since
September 2004.
>
> >>>>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that the only place Joe
Malloy trolls
> >>>>>>>> is here, Nightingale.
>
> >>>>>>> What he does in other groups is irrelevant.
>
> >>>>>> Incorrect, given that it represents substantiation regarding
Patterson's
> >>>>>> erroneous presupposition.
>
> >>>>> How so?
>
> >>>> Because he hasn't been fed, yet he hasn't gone away,
Nightingale.
>
> >> Note: no response.
>
> > He didn't find anything in this group, which is what concerns me
and
> > Don, to his liking & didn't stay long.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that he didn't find anything in this
> group, Nightingale.

What does your bull*** have to do with classical music, Bruce?

> >>>>> If anything, it substantiates his point: this group apparently

> >>>>> does not feed Malloy as well as other groups do, and he does
not post
> >>>>> here now.
>
> >>>> You're still erroneously presupposing that the only place Joe
Malloy
> >>>> trolls is here, Nightingale.
>
> >>> I'm presupposing nothing about what he does elsewhere,
>
> >> Incorrect, given that you claimed that it substantiates Sacque's
point.
>
> Note: no response.

What does your lack of response have to do with FORTRAN, Bruce?

> >>> and do not have any interest in finding out
>
> >> Why aren't you interested in the truth, Nightingale?
>
> > It it not that I am uninterested in the truth, Tholen. I just
don't
> > think that Malloy has any relevance to either music or this group.
>
> What you think is irrelevant, Nightingale. The fact is that Malloy
> has relevance to the claim that starved trolls go away.

What does that have to do with OS/2, Bruce?

> > Why do you keep mentioning him?
>
> Because Sacque is wrong when he says that starved trolls go away.

What does that have to do with sci.astro, Bruce?

> >>> - he didn't post anything interesting here when he graced us with
his
> >>> presence last year & I'm glad that he's gone away again.
>
> >> You're still erroneously presupposing that the only place Joe
Malloy
> >> trolls is here, Nightingale.
>
> > Actually, I see almost no evidence that he actually trolls here
>
> You're still erroneously presupposing that the only place Joe Malloy
> trolls is here, Nightingale.

What does that have to do with you being a Usenet kook, Bruce?

> > - it looks like he wandered in on some crossposts from his home
group(s).
>
> What it looks like to you is also irrelevant, Nightingale.

What you look like is irrelevant, Bruce, but you look as ugly as
*** just the same.

> >>>>>>> Don was talking about this one & Malloy leaves us alone.
>
> >>>>>> Incorrect.
>
> >>>>> Malloy has certainly been leaving us alone for quite a while,
>
> >>>> Incorrect.
>
> >>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>
> >> On the basis of his recent postings that haven't left me alone,
> >> Nightingale.
>
> > OK - by "us" I meant just this newsgroup
>
> Newsgroups aren't "us". People participating in newsgroups are "us".

You are a kook, Bruce, you are not part of "us".

> > (and I'm sure that was also Don's concern).
>
> On what basis are you speaking for Don, Nightingale?

On what basis are you, Bruce?

> > I don't understand why so many of the trolls like to
> > follow you all over the place & cause trouble - judging from what
I've
> > seen here, it's undeserved.
>
> It's not just me; I've observed lot of trolls to follow lots of other
> people around and cause trouble.

You have, bruce?

> > Is Malloy like Deco, Bruce & the others who are infesting this
group?
>
> Malloy is unique.

And you are still full of ***, Bruce.

> >>>>> although I suppose that could change.
>
> >>>> Sure, just like bisectional's New Years resolution.
>
> >>> ?
>
> >> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, Nightingale?
>
> > What was his resolution? He's in my killfile since he followed me
to
> > another group & forged posts in my name - a few of his posts have
been
> > quoted, like the time he actually asked an on-topic question, but I

> > don't recall seeing that one.
>
> He stated his intent to stop antagonizing me, Nightingale. I've been
> quoting his "one last parting shot" claim in the digests whenever he
> takes more shots. Of course, you would know that by now if you had
> better reading comprehension skills.

You shouldn't antagonise him then, Bruce.

> > Do you make New Years resolutions? I very rarely do, and never
announce
> > them - I wouldn't want people reminding me of them forever if I
wasn't
> > successful in keeping them.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Nightingale?

Note: no response.