Re: CVF to Intel USE statements
From: Steve Lionel (Steve.Lionel_at_REMOVEintelME.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Rich Townsend: "Re: What's most FAMOUS linear algebra package?"
- Previous message: Richard E Maine: "Re: IBM/Absoft bug on Mac OS-X"
- In reply to: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: CVF to Intel USE statements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:07:37 -0500
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:53:57 -0500, Herman D. Knoble
<SkipKnobleLESS@SPAMpsu.DOT.edu> wrote:
>This is a valuable document. Yep, the information I requested
>is given in that document's:
>Table 1: Old and New Names of System and Library Modules
Glad to hear it. For the benefit of others, this document is linked to in
the right-hand column of the Intel Visual Fortran product page on intel.,com
>It's good to hear that the Premier Support login will be improved.
>I was able to login to Premier Support; that alone hopefully will,
>in the future, enable me to post to the forums.
Well, no, that isn't in the works. But you will probably be able to use the
same password both places and not be required to use a "strong" password nor
change it regularly on the Premier Support side. (As far as I know, the Intel
Developer Support login doesn't have those requirements.)
>We have a 140,000 lines of Fortran 77 mixed with Fortran 90 syntax.
>The developer used CVF. I am happy to report that with the
>USE DFPORT and USE DFLIB changed to USE IFPORT and USE IFCORE,
>changes cited in the Table 1 (from the URL you kindly provided),
>the whole thing compiles and links with no errors using the Intel
>compiler (for Linux). Impressive!
I like to hear that!
>One of the most convenient
>conversion crutches provided by IFORT was that it allowed Fortran
>90 syntax with source module file extensions of .for . Thus mixing
>source modules sytax was quick and easy.
Fortran 90 syntax, such as MODULE, etc., is allowed in both fixed-form and
free-form source with any Fortran 90 compiler. This is not a special ifort
feature (though if you wish to give us credit for it, I can't complain...).
If you're using fixed-form source, you can continue to do so if you wish, and
still make use of all Fortran 90/95 syntax. I do generally recommend the use
of free-form source in new development, as it is easier to develop and creates
fewer surprises due to longer source lines and blanks being significant.
>Most likely this research group user will lease the Intel Compiler
>for Windows; although we're offering use of our Linux cluster so
>that they would have run-access to this code from anywhere in
>the world.
Nice to hear - please let us know at Intel Premier Support if we may be of
assistance in the future, and do check out our very active user forums.
Steve Lionel
Software Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH
User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://developer.intel.com/software/products/support/
- Next message: Rich Townsend: "Re: What's most FAMOUS linear algebra package?"
- Previous message: Richard E Maine: "Re: IBM/Absoft bug on Mac OS-X"
- In reply to: Herman D. Knoble: "Re: CVF to Intel USE statements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
