Re: Trolls & other things...
From: Michael Baldwin Bruce (mbbruce_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: NOMINATION: Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 11 Mar 2005 18:48:31 -0800
Bruce AKA tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Nightingale writes:
>
> >>>>> & why you are continuing.
>
> >>>> I stand my ground against antagonists, Nightingale. Of course,
I've
> >>>> said that before, which you would know by now if you had better
> >>>> reading comprehension skills.
>
> >>> So do you consider me to be antagonistic?
>
> >> What I consider you to be is irrelevant, Nightingale. The facts
are
> >> relevant, and one fact is that you are continuing a thread started
by
> >> Sacque that is both off-topic and antagonistic.
>
> > I joined this thread because, like you, I disagreed with things
that Don
> > said.
>
> You are not, like me, the target of Sacque's antagonism.
Hold still, arsehole, and we won't miss.
> > No argument with the fact that this thread is off-topic,
>
> Can't you show a little restraint?
Can you, Bruce? No, because you're an arsehole who has to have
the last word.
> > but nothing I have posted was intended to be antagonistic.
>
> Something you have posted was intended to continue the thread.
Go *** yourself, Bruce. What business is it of yours?
> > The reason I changed the subject line is because I did not like
> > that he called you a troll.
>
> Sacque having started the thread makes him, ironically, the troll.
No, you are the troll, Bruce. You are also a kook and a loony ***.
> >> I've stated quite
> >> clearly that I intend to stand my ground against such antagonists.
So,
> >> what it your motive for continuing this thread?
>
> > As I have explained before, you replied to my posts, and said
things or
> > asked questions that I wanted to reply to. It takes at least two
people
> > to continue a thread,
>
> I'm standing my ground against antagonists. What's your motivation?
You're a kook and a troll, Bruce. That's motivation enough.
> > and it hardly seems fair for you to ask questions
>
> Like "What does that have to do with classical music?"
You're one to ask, Bruce.
> > and then complain when I continue to reply, but that doesn't really
> > matter. Although there are still a few things in the thread that I
was
> > going to respond to, after seeing this reply I have decided to drop
it. Bye.
>
> Wonderful.
Shazam!
- Next message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: NOMINATION: Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Previous message: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Maybe in reply to: Michael Baldwin Bruce: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Trolls & other things..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]