Re: Namelist Internal Read
From: Walt Brainerd (walt_at_fortran.com)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Previous message: carlos_at_colorado.edu: "Re: Looking for gen symm sparse eigensolver in C or C++"
- In reply to: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Next in thread: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: James Giles: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: Gordon Sande: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:13:17 -0700 To: gary.l.scott@lmco.com
gary.l.scott@lmco.com wrote:
> I've also never quite understood the need for the quirky &.../ syntax.
It's the same reason as the inconsistent names for
the bit intrinsics. I am not sure where namelist
came from originally, but probably some vendor did
it many years ago and some individual thought up
what seemed like a neat scheme at the time.
When it came up for standardization, "existing
practice" was picked, rather than a nicer design.
[Take note, ye who complain that the standards
committee never adopts existing practice.]
-- Walt Brainerd +1-877-355-6640 (voice & fax) The Fortran Company +1-520-760-1397 (outside USA) 6025 N. Wilmot Road walt@fortran.com Tucson, AZ 85750 USA http://www.fortran.com
- Next message: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Previous message: carlos_at_colorado.edu: "Re: Looking for gen symm sparse eigensolver in C or C++"
- In reply to: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Next in thread: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: gary.l.scott_at_lmco.com: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: James Giles: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Reply: Gordon Sande: "Re: Namelist Internal Read"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|