Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne <MyFirstName.MyLastName@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1114637368.492845.49720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, beliavsky@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> The following code demonstrates Ken Fairfield's suggestion of putting
> the functions in a separate module.
>
> <snip code>
Thanks. I know this approach, but I was wondering if it is possible to
do it without the modules since apparently this file was under my
'testfiles directory'...
As Keith mentioned, I am also wondering if this was an example that I
have been able to compile somewhere in the past... It could be that it was
just an attempt and that I left it 'as is' once i saw i didn't get it to
compile...
Is there a way to do this same thing without modules, in one single program
file?
Regards,
Bart
--
"Share what you know. Learn what you don't."
.
- References:
- why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Ken Fairfield
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: beliavsky
- why doesn't this compile ?
- Prev by Date: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Next by Date: Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?
- Previous by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Next by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|