Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard Maine <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:03:26 -0700
beliavsky@xxxxxxx writes:
> Richard E Maine wrote:
>> Looks fine to me. And it compiles and runs fine with both compilers that
>> I just tried (Nag and g95). This suggests a compiler problem.
>
> I think the original code at the link Bart provided was different from
> what is currently there, and the original code was not accepted by the
> compilers I tried. I think it was...
[code elided]
Oh. Well that's completely different.
</grump mode>
I can't diagnose problems very well if the code I'm shown isn't
actually the code with the problem. If I had seen the actual code
with the problem, I wouldn't have needed to test it - I'd have recognized
the problem at once.
</end grump mode>
I already wrote up an explanation of exactly the same coding error in
another thread today. I'll just reference that thread instead of
retyping it. (Ok, maybe I'm not entirely out of grump mode yet.)
Look for the thread titled "compilation problem with
module function interface definition" with "phony account" (Mirko)
as the OP.
--
Richard Maine
email: my last name at domain
domain: summertriangle dot net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- References:
- why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: beliavsky
- why doesn't this compile ?
- Prev by Date: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Next by Date: Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?
- Previous by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Next by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|