Re: why doesn't this compile ?

In article <1114705869.681980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bart Vandewoestyne <MyFirstName.MyLastName@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <nospam-BF37BA.08405228042005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard E Maine
> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~bartv/downloads/test_array_arguments_02.f95

> So my guess that in current standard Fortran 90/95 this code should indeed
> not compile is right, right?

Right.

That exact form shouldn't compile in f2003 either. You'd need to use
PROCEDURE statement(s) instead of interface bodies in the interface
block to make it compile in f2003.

--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Specifying at 16-bit integer
    ... > I try to use only Standard Fortran in my programs, ... > One of the long-standing problems is declaring variables with a ... f90: COMPILE TIME 0.060000 SECONDS ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: read data
    ... when I compile it, i have 1.exe, I want to do this ... to execute and read in a number 3 in ONE line, ... Second requires using an extension to read the command line and parse ... Not in Standard Fortran until F2003 but ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)