Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne <MyFirstName.MyLastName@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:31:09 +0000 (UTC)
In article <nospam-BF37BA.08405228042005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard E Maine wrote:
>
>> http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~bartv/downloads/test_array_arguments_02.f95
>
> Interesting. This is a variant of an issue that is addressed (with a
> quite simple fix) in f2003. I had not seen quite this variant, with
> internal procedures, but still it is recognizable as a variant of the
> same thing.
>
> Up though f95, there are 2 options for specifying a specific procedure
> in a generic interface block. You either have an interface body or use a
> module procedure statement. If you have a procedure whose interface is
> already explicit, but which is not a module procedure, then this is
> awkward.
So my guess that in current standard Fortran 90/95 this code should indeed not
compile is right, right?
Regards,
Bart
--
"Share what you know. Learn what you don't."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- References:
- why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: beliavsky
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- From: Richard E Maine
- why doesn't this compile ?
- Prev by Date: Re: strange linking problem
- Next by Date: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Previous by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Next by thread: Re: why doesn't this compile ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|