Re: strange linking problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:21:17 -0700
Richard E Maine wrote:
In article <D8ydneYJcsMupOzfRVn-qw@xxxxxxxxxxx>, glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This can cause some interesting
effects if you accidentally (or not) name COMMON the same as a subroutine.
Been there. Was no fun. :-( Accidentally.
I did see one once that coded the OS/360 system call to return the time, along with appropriate initialization and return instruction into an eight byte floating point constant. It was then used to initialize a COMMON variable, and called to return the time. That is the only non-accidental one I remember.
-- glen
.
- References:
- strange linking problem
- From: nicolasbock
- Re: strange linking problem
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: strange linking problem
- From: nicolasbock
- Re: strange linking problem
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: strange linking problem
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: strange linking problem
- From: Richard E Maine
- strange linking problem
- Prev by Date: Re: strange linking problem
- Next by Date: Re: mixing logical with real in equation
- Previous by thread: Re: strange linking problem
- Next by thread: Defining new operators
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|