Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: "Gerald F. Thomas" <gfthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:14:37 -0400
"James Giles" <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FXdce.149807$cg1.74929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
....
> There's even a proposal for INTENT(UNUSED) to explicitly
> describe such arguments.
That's what's called a sitting duck, dead in the water!, maybe!
--
You're Welcome,
Gerry T.
______
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." -- Feynman.
.
- References:
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: James Giles
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Prev by Date: Re: COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS - Help with SIMPLE algorithm implementation
- Next by Date: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Previous by thread: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Next by thread: Re: graphics and bounds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
