Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: "Michael Metcalf" <metcalfmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:11:11 +0200
"glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fydnY-tSIepX-zfRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> James Giles wrote:
>
> Maybe in a few years decimal floating point will get popular, and
> this problem will go away. That is, 1.23 will be exactly 1.23, single
> or double precision. There are people working on an efficient float
> decimal system.
>
One of the first computers I ever saw had sterling (pounds, shillings and
pence) hardware. Maybe there are some blueprints still around!
Regards,
Mike Metcalf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- References:
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: James Giles
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Prev by Date: Re: COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS - Help with SIMPLE algorithm implementation
- Next by Date: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Previous by thread: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Next by thread: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|