Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: bv <bvoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:36:34 GMT
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>
> Maybe in a few years decimal floating point will get popular, and
> this problem will go away. That is, 1.23 will be exactly 1.23, single
> or double precision. There are people working on an efficient float
> decimal system.
Let's hope they'll do a better job than a mangled mess that is a
fattened, no, obese Fortran d'jour. In the meantime, here's a sample
number purification system (sans KINDling perversions),
real*8 a,w
data x/1.23/
print*, x
a = w(x)
print*, a
1.230000
1.23000000000000
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: James Giles
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- References:
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Phony Account
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: James Giles
- Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Prev by Date: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Next by Date: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Previous by thread: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Next by thread: Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|