comp.lang.fortran

• Date Index

• something like MS Visual Studio for Fortran?, Randall Mackie
  • Re: something like MS Visual Studio for Fortran?, Steve Lionel
• Fortran book advertisement, R . Vowels
• standard question: function overload, Christoph Arns
  • Re: standard question: function overload, Steve Lionel
• calling Microsoft PlaySound routine from CVF, Jerry A Green
  • Re: calling Microsoft PlaySound routine from CVF, Steve Lionel
• compilation on different machines led to different executables, bau12374
  • Re: compilation on different machines led to different executables, Tim Prince
• auto generation of make files, best location for tests, Neilen Marais
  • Re: auto generation of make files, best location for tests, Douglas Cox
• Book on low level program optimization, Niels L. Ellegaard
  • Re: Book on low level program optimization, Dan Nagle
  • Re: Book on low level program optimization, beliavsky
  • Re: Book on low level program optimization, J DUDLEY
  • Re: Book on low level program optimization, David Flower
    • Re: Book on low level program optimization, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Book on low level program optimization, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Book on low level program optimization, Joost
• question about "call qsort", Elena
  • Re: question about "call qsort", glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: question about "call qsort", bv
    • Re: question about "call qsort", James Van Buskirk
  • Re: question about "call qsort", David Frank
  • Re: question about "call qsort", Herman D . Knoble
• advance="no" not portable, Eric Lavigne
  • Re: advance="no" not portable, Richard E Maine
• question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, Randall Mackie
  • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, Richard E Maine
  • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, James Giles
  • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, Dan Nagle
    • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, Randall Mackie
    • Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments, Gary L. Scott
• a.out file, wiggy13
  • Re: a.out file, Rich Townsend
    • Re: a.out file, Boo, hoo!
  • Re: a.out file, Richard E Maine
    • Re: a.out file, wiggy13
      • Re: a.out file, Rich Townsend
      • Re: a.out file, Richard E Maine
      • Re: a.out file, wiggy13
      • Re: a.out file, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: a.out file, wiggy13
      • Re: a.out file, John Doe
      • Re: a.out file, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: a.out file, wiggy13
• implementation of DACOSD, Damien MATTEI
  • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Michel OLAGNON
    • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Damien MATTEI
      • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Michel OLAGNON
  • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Michel OLAGNON
    • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Rich Townsend
    • Re: implementation of DACOSD, James Van Buskirk
  • Re: implementation of DACOSD, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • implementation of DACOSD, Damien MATTEI
    • Re: implementation of DACOSD, Herman D . Knoble
• [ita] Question, Borgo
  • Re: Question, Salvatore
• Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Gojko Magazinovic
  • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Dave Seaman
    • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Gojko Magazinovic
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Gojko Magazinovic
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Gojko Magazinovic
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Steve Lionel
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Steve Lionel
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Steve Lionel
      • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Boo, hoo!
  • Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other), Boo, hoo!
• gprof and optimization, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
  • Re: gprof and optimization, Andy Vaught
    • Re: gprof and optimization, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Shahabfar
  • RE: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, meek
    • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, bv
      • RE: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, meek
  • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, beliavsky
    • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Clive Page
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Steve Lionel
    • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Boo, hoo!
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, J. F. Cornwall
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Boo, hoo!
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Rich Townsend
      • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Boo, hoo!
  • Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP, Dick Russell
• static function ? how ?, KC
  • Re: static function ? how ?, Arjen Markus
    • Re: static function ? how ?, beliavsky
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Arjen Markus
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Arjen Markus
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Andy Vaught
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Arjen Markus
  • Re: static function ? how ?, Ian Bush
    • Re: static function ? how ?, KC
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Arjen Markus
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Greg Lindahl
    • Re: static function ? how ?, bv
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: static function ? how ?, Rich Townsend
• cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x, gh14tq5
  • Re: cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x, robin
• linking dll, tayfuncakirtas
• module procedure in main program, John Harper
  • Re: module procedure in main program, Richard E Maine
• SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), clusardi2k
  • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Richard E Maine
  • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Paul Van Delst
    • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Richard E Maine
      • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Paul Van Delst
      • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Richard E Maine
      • Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr), Greg Lindahl
• remove warnings, Fortran coder
  • Re: remove warnings, David Flower
    • Re: remove warnings, Damien MATTEI
    • Re: remove warnings, Damien MATTEI
  • Re: remove warnings, Steve Lionel
• ifort compiler option, icymist
  • Re: ifort compiler option, Ian Bush
    • Re: ifort compiler option, Steve Lionel
  • Re: ifort compiler option, Alfredo Buttari
• Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
  • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Richard Edgar
    • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, FJRA
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, e p chandler
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Michael Bader
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, Aymeric Peyret
  • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, John Lansberry
    • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, Aymeric Peyret
      • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, bv
  • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, Duane Bozarth
    • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, Steve Lionel
      • Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro, Boo, hoo!
• wrong output from a variable (newbie question), Darius
  • Re: wrong output from a variable (newbie question), Ian Bush
  • Re: wrong output from a variable (newbie question), Richard E Maine
• in defense of "star" notation, e p chandler
  • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Steven G. Kargl
    • Re: in defense of "star" notation, e p chandler
  • Re: in defense of "star" notation, David Flower
  • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Richard E Maine
    • Re: in defense of "star" notation, e p chandler
      • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Richard E Maine
      • Re: in defense of "star" notation, e p chandler
      • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Richard E Maine
      • Re: in defense of "star" notation, David Flower
      • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Richard E Maine
    • Re: in defense of "star" notation, Dave Thompson
• Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, tivonut
  • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Tim Prince
    • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Arjen Markus
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Charles Russell
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, tivonut
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux, glen herrmannsfeldt
• array 2D to 1D, Fabian Braennstroem
  • Re: array 2D to 1D, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: array 2D to 1D, Fabian Braennstroem
  • Re: array 2D to 1D, Jan Vorbrüggen
    • Re: array 2D to 1D, Fabian Braennstroem
      • Re: array 2D to 1D, Tim Prince
      • Re: array 2D to 1D, Fabian Braennstroem
• Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, vashwath
  • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Dave Weatherall
    • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, vashwath
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, John Mansell
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Ian Bush
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, vashwath
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, John Mansell
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Arjen Markus
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, e p chandler
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, e p chandler
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, e p chandler
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, e p chandler
    • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, Dave Weatherall
  • Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(, e p chandler
• How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, clusardi2k
  • Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, Gary L. Scott
    • Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, Arjen Markus
  • Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, Walter Spector
  • Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements, breyfogle
• what are these errors, student
  • Re: what are these errors, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: what are these errors, Dick Hendrickson
    • Re: what are these errors, student
      • Re: what are these errors, Richard Maine
      • Re: what are these errors, student
      • Re: what are these errors, student
      • Re: what are these errors, student
      • Re: what are these errors, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: what are these errors, Richard E Maine
      • Re: what are these errors, student
      • Re: what are these errors, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: what are these errors, Janne Blomqvist
      • Re: what are these errors, student
    • Re: what are these errors, Tim Prince
      • Re: what are these errors, Steven G. Kargl
• any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Charles Russell
  • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Jim
    • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Charles Russell
  • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Dick Hendrickson
    • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Charles Russell
      • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, Dick Hendrickson
  • Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?, mcalhoun
• RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, beliavsky
    • Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, Tim Prince
      • Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, John Doe
      • Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, Steve Lionel
  • Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?, Madhusudan Singh
• free fortran compiler for windows?, student
  • Re: free fortran compiler for windows?, Tim Prince
    • Re: free fortran compiler for windows?, Clive Page
      • Re: free fortran compiler for windows?, student
  • Re: free fortran compiler for windows?, beliavsky
  • Re: free fortran compiler for windows?, Herman D . Knoble
• Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
  • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, James Giles
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, James Giles
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, James Giles
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, James Giles
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, James Giles
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
    • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, Joost
      • Re: Program runs slower than the beginning, zwang5
• Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Berthold Höllmann
  • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Ron Shepard
    • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Berthold Höllmann
      • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Walter Spector
      • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Richard Maine
      • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Greg Lindahl
  • Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system, Ken Fairfield
• Re: Announcement : New gnuplotfortran version (0.2.1) is available, Joost
  • Re: Announcement : New gnuplotfortran version (0.2.1) is available, Madhusudan Singh
• Help.. subroutines etc.., mysticorion
  • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., Joost
  • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., Richard E Maine
  • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., epc8@xxxxxxxx
    • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., Richard Maine
    • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., epc8@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., Ron Shepard
    • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., epc8@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., mysticorion
      • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., FJRA
      • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., epc8@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help.. subroutines etc.., FJRA
• Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., nobat
  • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
    • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gordon Sande
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Paul Van Delst
    • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., FJRA
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., owl
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., NuclearWizard
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Ron Shepard
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., NuclearWizard
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., NuclearWizard
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gareth Owen
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Anton Haumer
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Paul Van Delst
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., David Flower
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Charles Russell
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Charles Russell
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Charles Russell
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Charles Russell
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Richard E Maine
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gordon Sande
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gary L. Scott
  • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Anton Haumer
    • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers..., Michael Metcalf
• default constructor, Levent
  • Re: default constructor, beliavsky
    • Re: default constructor, Joost
    • Re: default constructor, Richard E Maine
• Computing exp(z), gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Computing exp(z), Tim Prince
    • Re: Computing exp(z), gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Computing exp(z), David Frank
      • Re: Computing exp(z), David Frank
      • Re: Computing exp(z), David Frank
      • Re: Computing exp(z), glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Computing exp(z), Ron Shepard
    • Re: Computing exp(z), James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Computing exp(z), Joost
      • Re: Computing exp(z), James Van Buskirk
    • Re: Computing exp(z), Tim Prince
      • Re: Computing exp(z), Richard E Maine
      • Re: Computing exp(z), gh14tq5
      • Re: Computing exp(z), Greg Lindahl
    • Re: Computing exp(z), gh14tq5
      • Re: Computing exp(z), Ron Shepard
• Visualising program structure, s8ngsu3
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Richard E Maine
  • Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    • Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Brooks Moses
      • Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Harald Anlauf
      • Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Richard E Maine
      • Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran, Brooks Moses
• source line count, Al
  • Re: source line count, beliavsky
    • Re: source line count, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: source line count, Duane Bozarth
  • Re: source line count, Richard E Maine
  • Re: source line count, David Flower
    • Re: source line count, mcalhoun
  • Re: source line count, Janne Blomqvist
• My philosophy, David Flower
  • Re: My philosophy, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: My philosophy, Dick Russell
      • Re: My philosophy, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: My philosophy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: My philosophy, David Flower
      • Re: My philosophy, beliavsky
  • Re: My philosophy, beliavsky
    • Re: My philosophy, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: My philosophy, beliavsky
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Colin Watters
      • Re: My philosophy, David Flower
      • Re: My philosophy, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: My philosophy, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: My philosophy, Dave Thompson
      • Re: My philosophy, Michel OLAGNON
      • Re: My philosophy, Charles Russell
      • Re: My philosophy, Gordon Sande
      • Re: My philosophy, David Flower
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Charles Russell
      • Re: My philosophy, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Gordon Sande
      • Re: My philosophy, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: My philosophy, David Flower
      • Re: My philosophy, Walter Spector
      • Re: My philosophy, John Harper
      • Re: My philosophy, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: My philosophy, Walter Spector
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, Charles Russell
      • Re: My philosophy, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: My philosophy, Charles Russell
      • Re: My philosophy, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: My philosophy, Rich Townsend
      • Re: My philosophy, Boo, hoo!
      • Re: My philosophy, Gordon Sande
      • Re: My philosophy, Andy Spragg
      • Re: My philosophy, NuclearWizard
      • Re: My philosophy, beliavsky
      • Re: My philosophy, bv
      • Re: My philosophy, Clive Page
      • Re: My philosophy, kia
      • Re: My philosophy, beliavsky
      • Re: My philosophy, Andy Spragg
      • Re: My philosophy, Richard E Maine
      • Re: My philosophy, mcalhoun
      • Re: My philosophy, David Flower
      • Re: My philosophy, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: My philosophy, James Giles
• how to open list of files, wiggy13
  • Re: how to open list of files, beliavsky
    • Re: how to open list of files, wiggy13
• equivalence, Daniel
  • Re: equivalence, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: equivalence, David Frank
      • Re: equivalence, Daniel
      • Re: equivalence, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: equivalence, David Frank
    • Re: equivalence, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: equivalence, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: equivalence, Richard E Maine
      • Re: equivalence, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: equivalence, Ken Fairfield
• Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Ryo
  • Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Ryo
      • Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Michael Metcalf
  • Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, FJRA
      • Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop, Richard Maine
• Optimizing exponentiation, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
  • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Michel OLAGNON
    • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Michel OLAGNON
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, James Giles
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Joost
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, David Jones
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Jean-Baptiste FAURE
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Tim Prince
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, bv
  • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Carlie J. Coats
  • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, James Giles
      • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, David Jones
    • Re: Optimizing exponentiation, Tim Prince
• Re: Integration advice, David Flower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Integration advice, kaci_tizi_ouzou2000
  • Re: Integration advice, Peter Spellucci
• best cpu, Tony199
  • Re: best cpu, Tony199
  • Re: best cpu, Tim Prince
    • Re: best cpu, Tony199
      • Re: best cpu, Gordon Sande
      • Re: best cpu, Tony199
      • Re: best cpu, Steven G. Kargl
      • Re: best cpu, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: best cpu, Steve Kargl
    • Re: best cpu, Tony199
      • Re: best cpu, Tim Prince
      • Re: best cpu, Tony199
      • Re: best cpu, Tim Prince
      • Re: best cpu, beliavsky
      • Re: best cpu, Michael Gray
• gdb now compatible with Fortran?, Ying Zu
• block data and namelist, Thomas Koenig
  • Re: block data and namelist, Greg Lindahl
  • Re: block data and namelist, Richard E Maine
  • Re: block data and namelist, James Giles
    • Re: block data and namelist, Thomas Koenig
      • Re: block data and namelist, James Giles
  • Re: block data and namelist, Steve Lionel
• spawning processes, Al
  • Re: spawning processes, Arjen Markus
    • Re: spawning processes, Herman D . Knoble
      • Re: spawning processes, Al
      • Re: spawning processes, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: spawning processes, FJRA
      • Re: spawning processes, Richard Edgar
      • Re: spawning processes, Joost
      • Re: spawning processes, Ian Bush
• Very Basic question from Newbie, vashwath
  • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, Arjen Markus
  • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, Ian Bush
    • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, David Flower
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, epc8@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, David Flower
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, Ian Bush
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Very Basic question from Newbie, Richard E Maine
      • Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie), James Giles
      • Re: Aliased arguments, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Aliased arguments, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Aliased arguments, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Aliased arguments, James Giles
      • Re: Aliased arguments, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie), David Frank
      • Re: Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie), James Giles
• Maximum Precision Format Descriptor, Ron Shepard
• MS FORTRAN 5.x and direct access..., mcalhoun
• [F77] Format statement problem, RR
  • Re: Format statement problem, David Flower
    • Re: Format statement problem, Richard E Maine
  • Re: [F77] Format statement problem, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: [F77] Format statement problem, Ron Shepard
  • Re: [F77] Format statement problem, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: [F77] Format statement problem, RR
• How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, Ying Zu
  • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, David Flower
    • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, Dick Russell
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, zuying@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, Dick Russell
    • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT), Michael Metcalf
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT), Michel OLAGNON
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT), Michael Metcalf
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT), Michel OLAGNON
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT), Boo, hoo!
    • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, beliavsky
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, David Flower
      • RE: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, meek
      • Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?, Michel OLAGNON
• Statement function host association, John Harper
  • Re: Statement function host association, Richard Maine
    • Re: Statement function host association, Herman D . Knoble
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, Herman D . Knoble
      • Re: Statement function host association, robert . corbett
      • Re: Statement function host association, John Harper
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, John Harper
      • Re: Statement function host association, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: Statement function host association, bv
      • Re: Statement function host association, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Duane Bozarth
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Steve Lionel
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Van Buskirk
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, John Harper
      • Re: Statement function host association, Ken Fairfield
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Statement function host association, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Statement function host association, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Statement function host association, David Flower
      • Re: Statement function host association, Dan Nagle
      • Re: Statement function host association, David Flower
      • Re: Statement function host association, Dick Hendrickson
      • Re: Statement function host association, robert . corbett
      • Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), beliavsky
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), Ron Shepard
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), Richard E Maine
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), Michael Metcalf
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), Steve Lionel
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association), bv
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Statement function host association, James Giles
      • Re: Statement function host association, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Statement function host association, Dan Nagle
      • Fortran and Python (was Re: Statement function host association), beliavsky
• Volatile and Pointer, Ian Bush
  • Re: Volatile and Pointer, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Volatile and Pointer, Ian Bush
      • Re: Volatile and Pointer, Michael Metcalf
• Which programming environment is better?, Ying Zu
  • Re: Which programming environment is better?, Yongtao Yang
  • Re: Which programming environment is better?, FCC
    • Re: Which programming environment is better?, Helge Avlesen
      • Re: Which programming environment is better?, FCC
      • Re: Which programming environment is better?, Helge Avlesen
• cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays, Charles Russell
  • Re: cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays, Charles Russell
    • Re: cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays, Mark Hadfield
• simple question about writting, beatdown
  • Re: simple question about writting, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: simple question about writting, John Harper
  • Re: simple question about writting, Michael Prager
  • Re: simple question about writting, bv
  • Re: simple question about writting, beatdown
• basic question, mats_trash
  • Re: basic question, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • RE: basic question, meek
  • Re: basic question, Janne Blomqvist
    • Re: basic question, Gordon Sande
      • Re: basic question, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: basic question, mats_trash
      • Re: basic question, Charles LaCour
      • Re: basic question, Richard E Maine
• Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon, Mike
  • Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon, Andy Spragg
    • Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon, Mike
      • Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon, Andy Spragg
  • Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon, J DUDLEY
• Documenting the early history of FORTRAN, paul . mcjones
• Replacing lines in big files, justabeginner
  • Re: Replacing lines in big files, drfremove
    • Re: Replacing lines in big files, glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Replacing lines in big files, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Replacing lines in big files, justabeginner
• grammar for fortran language, Khamis Abuelkomboz
  • Re: grammar for fortran language, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Allocate Error with dgesdd, Jason Nielsen
  • Re: Allocate Error with dgesdd, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: Allocate Error with dgesdd, Jason Nielsen
• animating fortran lineprinter graphics, Charles Russell
  • Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics, Brooks Moses
    • Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics, Charles Russell
  • Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics, Jim Cownie
    • Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics, Charles Russell
• How to construct combination factors?, zwang5
  • Re: How to construct combination factors?, Brooks Moses
  • Re: How to construct combination factors?, James Van Buskirk
  • Re: How to construct combination factors?, David Frank
  • Re: How to construct combination factors?, Herman D . Knoble
• systemqq command question, justabeginner
  • Re: systemqq command question, Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: systemqq command question, Dick Russell
• iso varying string, Anton Haumer
  • Re: iso varying string, Richard E Maine
    • Re: iso varying string, Anton Haumer
• Unicode support, Simon Geard
  • Re: Unicode support, Arjen Markus
  • Re: Unicode support, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Unicode support, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Unicode support, Arjen Markus
      • Re: Unicode support, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Unicode support, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Unicode support, Richard E Maine
• Line terminators in formatted output, optionstraderjeff
  • Re: Line terminators in formatted output, epc8@xxxxxxxx
    • Re: Line terminators in formatted output, optionstraderjeff
      • Re: Line terminators in formatted output, epc8@xxxxxxxx
• call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?, Holstenman
  • Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?, Anton Haumer
    • Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?, Holstenman
    • Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?, Richard E Maine
• dlg%LIST, Windows dialog boxes, Brian
• RE: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file, meek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file, Richard E Maine
    • Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file, Paul Van Delst
    • Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• used library conflicts with default libraries, Yiorgos Lykidis
  • Re: used library conflicts with default libraries, David Flower
  • Re: used library conflicts with default libraries, Steve Lionel
    • Re: used library conflicts with default libraries, Yiorgos Lykidis
    • Re: used library conflicts with default libraries, Yiorgos Lykidis
      • Re: used library conflicts with default libraries, Steve Lionel
• Odd behavior of Open Watcom, Bob Goatse
  • RE: Odd behavior of Open Watcom, meek
    • Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom, Kevin G. Rhoads
      • Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom, Bob Goatse
      • Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom, Kevin G. Rhoads
• function pointer, Levent
  • Re: function pointer, Richard E Maine
  • Re: function pointer, Ron Shepard
    • Re: function pointer, Richard E Maine
  • Re: function pointer, Walter Spector
    • Re: function pointer, Richard E Maine
      • Re: function pointer, Walter Spector
      • Re: function pointer, Walter Spector
• 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), ibm@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Tim Prince
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Madhusudan Singh
    • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), jon
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Madhusudan Singh
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), jon
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), James Giles
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Madhusudan Singh
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), James Giles
      • Message not available
      • Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)), James Giles
      • Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)), Ryo
      • Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)), Greg Lindahl
      • Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)), Ryo
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), ejko123
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Ben Barrowes
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), J DUDLEY
    • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), beliavsky
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), beliavsky
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), J DUDLEY
      • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Arjen Markus
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), epc8@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), kia
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Colin Watters
  • Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C), Gib Bogle
• intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation, oran johnson
  • Re: intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation, Herman D . Knoble
  • Re: intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation, Tim Prince
• Visual Fortran error re. "dlgmodal" & "dialogm.f90", Norville Barnes
  • Re: Visual Fortran error re. "dlgmodal" & "dialogm.f90", Jugoslav Dujic
• Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, David
  • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Madhusudan Singh
    • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Ron Shepard
      • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Gordon Sande
  • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Alex Gibson
    • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem, David
• Compiler Comparison Update, John Appleyard
• Libraries libfor and libm, Daniel
  • Re: Libraries libfor and libm, Arjen Markus
    • Re: Libraries libfor and libm, Tim Prince
• Fortran calls C, Anton Haumer
  • Re: Fortran calls C, glen herrmannsfeldt
    • Re: Fortran calls C, Anton Haumer
      • Re: Fortran calls C, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Fortran calls C, Anton Haumer
      • Re: Fortran calls C, glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, Rich Townsend
    • Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, mcalhoun
      • Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran, Gib Bogle
• "<>", a relational operator?, Corkavenger
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard Maine
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, [JvO]
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, [JvO]
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Walt Brainerd
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, epc8@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, James Van Buskirk
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, robert . corbett
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Gordo
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Rich Townsend
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, NuclearWizard
  • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, gary . l . scott
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Walt Brainerd
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, epc8@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, epc8@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, James Giles
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Brooks Moses
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Arjen Markus
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard Edgar
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, James Giles
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Dave Thompson
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Richard E Maine
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, Paul Van Delst
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, James Giles
      • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, John Harper
    • Re: "<>", a relational operator?, James Giles
• Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, sreid
  • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, Richard E Maine
  • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, sreid
      • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, Richard E Maine
      • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, sreid
      • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, Jan Vorbrüggen
      • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, beliavsky
      • Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement, Richard E Maine
• Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Corkavenger
  • Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Richard E Maine
    • Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Corkavenger
      • Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Walt Brainerd
      • Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Richard Maine
  • Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array., Michael Metcalf
• Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90, icymist
  • Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90, janrom1
  • Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90, Walt Brainerd
    • Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90, Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?, Clive Page
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?, Clive Page
  • Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?, Clive Page
• Trouble with Double Precision, fortran_joeseph
  • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Klaus Wacker
  • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Kevin G. Rhoads
    • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, fortran_joeseph
  • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, John C. Bollinger
      • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Richard E Maine
  • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, epc8@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Herman D . Knoble
    • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, glen herrmannsfeldt
      • Re: Trouble with Double Precision, Herman D . Knoble
• Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition, Gordon Sande
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition, bv
    • Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition, James Giles
      • Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), bv
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), James Giles
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), Richard E Maine
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), James Giles
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), bv
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), James Giles
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), bv
      • Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition), James Giles
  • Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition, Dave Thompson
• can this caused memory corruption on viusal Frotran 6.5?, yexiangmo
• Fortran Forum April 2005, beliavsky
• Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, P Collins
  • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Steven G. Kargl
  • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Madhusudan Singh
    • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Richard E Maine
    • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Gordon Sande
      • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Madhusudan Singh
  • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, janrom1
  • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, Simon Geard
  • Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?, FCC
• Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it, Mikael O. Bonnier
  • Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it, janrom1
  • Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it, Douglas Cox
    • Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it, Mikael Bonnier
• help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather, yexiangmo
  • Re: help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather, hchu
    • Re: help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather, hchu
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran, Richard E Maine
  • Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran, Gerald F. Thomas
    • Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran, Gary L. Scott
      • Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran, Gerald F. Thomas
• Re: uniqueness of {if,do,case}-construct-name, Richard E Maine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: uniqueness of {if,do,case}-construct-name, Richard E Maine
• Re: why doesn't this compile ?, Rich Townsend
  • Re: why doesn't this compile ?, Michael Metcalf
    • Re: why doesn't this compile ?, Rich Townsend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why doesn't this compile ?, Gerald F. Thomas

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint