comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: something like MS Visual Studio for Fortran?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: NuclearWizard
• something like MS Visual Studio for Fortran?
  • From: Randall Mackie
• Fortran book advertisement
  • From: R . Vowels
• Re: standard question: function overload
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: calling Microsoft PlaySound routine from CVF
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: question about "call qsort"
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• standard question: function overload
  • From: Christoph Arns
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: compilation on different machines led to different executables
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: Joost
• calling Microsoft PlaySound routine from CVF
  • From: Jerry A Green
• compilation on different machines led to different executables
  • From: bau12374
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: David Flower
• RE: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: meek
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: J DUDLEY
• Re: question about "call qsort"
  • From: David Frank
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: auto generation of make files, best location for tests
  • From: Douglas Cox
• auto generation of make files, best location for tests
  • From: Neilen Marais
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Book on low level program optimization
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Book on low level program optimization
  • From: Niels L. Ellegaard
• Re: question about "call qsort"
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: question about "call qsort"
  • From: bv
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: James Giles
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: Randall Mackie
• Re: question about "call qsort"
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• question about "call qsort"
  • From: Elena
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: a.out file
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: a.out file
  • From: John Doe
• Re: a.out file
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: a.out file
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: bv
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: advance="no" not portable
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Andy Vaught
• advance="no" not portable
  • From: Eric Lavigne
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: a.out file
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
  • From: Randall Mackie
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: a.out file
  • From: Rich Townsend
• a.out file
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Question
  • From: Salvatore
• implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• implementation of DACOSD
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• [ita] Question
  • From: Borgo
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Gojko Magazinovic
• Re: gprof and optimization
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: basic question
  • From: Charles LaCour
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Gojko Magazinovic
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: gprof and optimization
  • From: Andy Vaught
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Gojko Magazinovic
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: John Harper
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays
  • From: Mark Hadfield
• Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Gojko Magazinovic
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: bv
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Rich Townsend
• gprof and optimization
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x
  • From: robin
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: KC
• Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: Shahabfar
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• RE: Running a fortran programm under Windows XP
  • From: meek
• Re: static function ? how ?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• static function ? how ?
  • From: KC
• Re: cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x
  • From: gh14tq5
• linking dll
  • From: tayfuncakirtas
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: module procedure in main program
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Charles Russell
• module procedure in main program
  • From: John Harper
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• SGI: OPEN ( ...,IOSTAT=ierr)
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: remove warnings
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: remove warnings
  • From: Damien MATTEI
• Re: remove warnings
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: remove warnings
  • From: David Flower
• remove warnings
  • From: Fortran coder
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: ifort compiler option
  • From: Alfredo Buttari
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: bv
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: Aymeric Peyret
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: wrong output from a variable (newbie question)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: ifort compiler option
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: FJRA
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: ifort compiler option
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: John Lansberry
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• ifort compiler option
  • From: icymist
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: wrong output from a variable (newbie question)
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Fortran and simple tree recursion
  • From: Michael Bader
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: David Flower
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Dave Weatherall
• Upgrades from CVF std to CVF/IVF Pro
  • From: Aymeric Peyret
• wrong output from a variable (newbie question)
  • From: Darius
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: NuclearWizard
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: NuclearWizard
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Joost
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: David Flower
• Re: in defense of "star" notation
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: John Doe
• in defense of "star" notation
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: tivonut
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: NuclearWizard
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: Tim Prince
• Porting fortran from HP/UX to Linux
  • From: tivonut
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: John Mansell
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: vashwath
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: John Mansell
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: vashwath
• Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: array 2D to 1D
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: Dave Weatherall
• array 2D to 1D
  • From: Fabian Braennstroem
• Cannot make out what is wrong!Please Help:-(
  • From: vashwath
• Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: kia
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: breyfogle
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• How to compile code with reversed slash in include statements
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: owl
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: what are these errors
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: James Giles
• Re: free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: student
• what are these errors
  • From: student
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Jim
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Richard Maine
• any modern counterpart of "if sense switch"?
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: FJRA
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: FJRA
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: bv
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: James Giles
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Eric Lavigne
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: FJRA
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Eric Lavigne
• Re: free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: James Giles
• Re: RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: beliavsky
• RANT: IVF needs MS VC.NET. What!?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Richard E Maine
• free fortran compiler for windows?
  • From: student
• Re: Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Berthold Höllmann
• Program runs slower than the beginning
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Harald Anlauf
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: mysticorion
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: beliavsky
• Legacy alloc on 64 Bit system
  • From: Berthold Höllmann
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: David Flower
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: gh14tq5
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: gh14tq5
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Announcement : New gnuplotfortran version (0.2.1) is available
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: Announcement : New gnuplotfortran version (0.2.1) is available
  • From: Joost
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: bv
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: Joost
• Help.. subroutines etc..
  • From: mysticorion
• Nice to have feature in upcoming Fortran compilers...
  • From: nobat
• Re: default constructor
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: default constructor
  • From: Joost
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: default constructor
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Joost
• default constructor
  • From: Levent
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: David Frank
• Fortran and Python (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Computing exp(z)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Computing exp(z)
  • From: gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Joost
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Visualising program structure
  • From: s8ngsu3
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: bv
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: source line count
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: source line count
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: source line count
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: David Flower
• Re: source line count
  • From: David Flower
• Re: source line count
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: source line count
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: source line count
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: how to open list of files
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: FJRA
• source line count
  • From: Al
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Al
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: zuying@xxxxxxxxx
• Fortran 2008 (was Re: Statement function host association)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: David Flower
• Re: My philosophy
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• My philosophy
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: bv
• Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: how to open list of files
  • From: beliavsky
• how to open list of files
  • From: wiggy13
• Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: FJRA
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: James Giles
• Re: equivalence
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: equivalence
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: David Jones
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Integration advice
  • From: Peter Spellucci
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Joost
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: equivalence
  • From: David Frank
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Ryo
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Daniel
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: equivalence
  • From: David Frank
• Re: equivalence
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• equivalence
  • From: Daniel
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: David Jones
• Q: GO TO the CONTINUE of a DO loop
  • From: Ryo
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Optimizing exponentiation
  • From: Jean-Baptiste FAURE
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Integration advice
  • From: kaci_tizi_ouzou2000
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Michael Gray
• Re: Integration advice
  • From: David Flower
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: best cpu
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: best cpu
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Aliased arguments
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Aliased arguments
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Aliased arguments
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• Re: Aliased arguments
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• best cpu
  • From: Tony199
• Re: Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie)
  • From: David Frank
• gdb now compatible with Fortran?
  • From: Ying Zu
• Re: Aliased arguments
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: James Giles
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Aliased arguments (was: Very Basic question from Newbie)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: James Giles
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: block data and namelist
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• block data and namelist
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: David Flower
• Re: spawning processes
  • From: Arjen Markus
• spawning processes
  • From: Al
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: [F77] Format statement problem
  • From: RR
• Re: Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Very Basic question from Newbie
  • From: vashwath
• Maximum Precision Format Descriptor
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT)
  • From: Boo, hoo!
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: James Giles
• MS FORTRAN 5.x and direct access...
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: Format statement problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT)
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: [F77] Format statement problem
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: [F77] Format statement problem
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: [F77] Format statement problem
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT)
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Format statement problem
  • From: David Flower
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array? (OT)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• [F77] Format statement problem
  • From: RR
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: Volatile and Pointer
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• RE: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: meek
• Re: How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: David Flower
• How can I read data from ".dat" file to an array?
  • From: Ying Zu
• Re: Statement function host association
  • From: Richard Maine
• Statement function host association
  • From: John Harper
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: ejko123
• Re: Volatile and Pointer
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C))
  • From: Ryo
• Re: Volatile and Pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Which programming environment is better?
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Re: Which programming environment is better?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Which programming environment is better?
  • From: Helge Avlesen
• Volatile and Pointer
  • From: Ian Bush
• Re: Which programming environment is better?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Which programming environment is better?
  • From: Yongtao Yang
• Which programming environment is better?
  • From: Ying Zu
• Re: simple question about writting
  • From: beatdown
• Re: basic question
  • From: mats_trash
• Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C))
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: simple question about writting
  • From: bv
• Re: cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C))
  • From: Ryo
• Re: simple question about writting
  • From: John Harper
• Re: basic question
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: John Harper
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: basic question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: simple question about writting
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: basic question
  • From: Gordon Sande
• cygwin now works OK with large g77 arrays
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: basic question
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: simple question about writting
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: James Giles
• simple question about writting
  • From: beatdown
• Re: Unix/Linux/BSD security vs. Windoze security (was Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C))
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon
  • From: J DUDLEY
• Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: Allocate Error with dgesdd
  • From: Jason Nielsen
• Re: Replacing lines in big files
  • From: justabeginner
• Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard Edgar
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon
  • From: Mike
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: How to construct combination factors?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: How to construct combination factors?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics
  • From: Jim Cownie
• RE: basic question
  • From: meek
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: basic question
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• basic question
  • From: mats_trash
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: How to construct combination factors?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Allocate Error with dgesdd
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: How to construct combination factors?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: animating fortran lineprinter graphics
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Replacing lines in big files
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Replacing lines in big files
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Visual fortran Childicon becomes explorer icon
  • From: Mike
• Documenting the early history of FORTRAN
  • From: paul . mcjones
• Re: Replacing lines in big files
  • From: drfremove
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Replacing lines in big files
  • From: justabeginner
• Re: grammar for fortran language
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• grammar for fortran language
  • From: Khamis Abuelkomboz
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Allocate Error with dgesdd
  • From: Jason Nielsen
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: iso varying string
  • From: Anton Haumer
• animating fortran lineprinter graphics
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: systemqq command question
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: systemqq command question
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• How to construct combination factors?
  • From: zwang5
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Line terminators in formatted output
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: iso varying string
  • From: Richard E Maine
• systemqq command question
  • From: justabeginner
• iso varying string
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: jon
• Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Line terminators in formatted output
  • From: optionstraderjeff
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Unicode support
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?
  • From: Holstenman
• Unicode support
  • From: Simon Geard
• Re: Line terminators in formatted output
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Line terminators in formatted output
  • From: optionstraderjeff
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
  • From: Dave Thompson
• call functions in static libraries from Fortran code?
  • From: Holstenman
• Re: Visual Fortran error re. "dlgmodal" & "dialogm.f90"
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran
  • From: Gerald F. Thomas
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: David
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: bv
• Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom
  • From: Bob Goatse
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Colin Watters
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: J DUDLEY
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• dlg%LIST, Windows dialog boxes
  • From: Brian
• Re: used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: jon
• Re: used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: Yiorgos Lykidis
• Re: used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: Yiorgos Lykidis
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Odd behavior of Open Watcom
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: NuclearWizard
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• RE: HP F95 for Open VMS and foreign file
  • From: meek
• Re: used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: David Flower
• used library conflicts with default libraries
  • From: Yiorgos Lykidis
• RE: Odd behavior of Open Watcom
  • From: meek
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: kia
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Odd behavior of Open Watcom
  • From: Bob Goatse
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: function pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• function pointer
  • From: Levent
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: J DUDLEY
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Ben Barrowes
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Dave Seaman
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Alex Gibson
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• 30 Miles of Bad Code (FORTRAN->C)
  • From: ibm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Dave Seaman
• intel visual fortran compiler hangs during installation
  • From: oran johnson
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: bv
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: James Giles
• Visual Fortran error re. "dlgmodal" & "dialogm.f90"
  • From: Norville Barnes
• Re: Fortran calls C
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran calls C
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Tiger OS X 10.4 Big Fortran Problem
  • From: David
• Compiler Comparison Update
  • From: John Appleyard
• Re: Fortran calls C
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Libraries libfor and libm
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Libraries libfor and libm
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Libraries libfor and libm
  • From: Daniel
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Fortran calls C
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran calls C
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Fortran calls C
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: sreid
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: sreid
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Gordo
• Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: FCC
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Simon Geard
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it
  • From: Mikael Bonnier
• Re: Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: James Giles
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: fortran_joeseph
• Dirty numbers (was: compilation problem with module function interface definition)
  • From: bv
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Type casting of integer to character in fortran
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• "<>", a relational operator?
  • From: Corkavenger
• Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Corkavenger
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Fortran90 CONTAINS statement
  • From: sreid
• Error: This name has not been declared as an array.
  • From: Corkavenger
• Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90
  • From: janrom1
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: janrom1
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: John C. Bollinger
• Req ; Pointers to using the make utility with fortran 90
  • From: icymist
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: epc8@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Detect EOF for direct access, unformatted files?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: Klaus Wacker
• Trouble with Double Precision
  • From: fortran_joeseph
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran
  • From: Gib Bogle
• Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
  • From: James Giles
• Re: help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather
  • From: hchu
• Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
  • From: bv
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather
  • From: hchu
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: compilation problem with module function interface definition
  • From: Gordon Sande
• can this caused memory corruption on viusal Frotran 6.5?
  • From: yexiangmo
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: why doesn't this compile ?
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Fortran Forum April 2005
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Free Fortran compilers with GUI in Linux?
  • From: P Collins
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it
  • From: Douglas Cox
• Re: Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it
  • From: janrom1
• Re: why doesn't this compile ?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Compiled a Fortran 90-program with Cygwin g95 -- gets 'Segmentation fault' when I try to run it
  • From: Mikael O. Bonnier
• Re: why doesn't this compile ?
  • From: Gerald F. Thomas
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran
  • From: Gerald F. Thomas
• help on memory corruption when visual fortran and VC++6.0 togather
  • From: yexiangmo
• Re: uniqueness of {if,do,case}-construct-name
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Find the size of variables in Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: uniqueness of {if,do,case}-construct-name
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: why doesn't this compile ?
  • From: Rich Townsend

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Fortran  > comp.lang.fortran  > 2005-05