Re: My philosophy
- From: Walter Spector <w6ws_xthisoutx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:40 GMT
David Flower wrote:
> ...
> One of the virtues of FORTRAN is that (with the single exception of F66
> DO-loops) it is backwards compatible.
I presume you are referring to the 1-trip, 0-trip thing. Various F66 compilers
went either way, as the 0-trip requirement was not codified until Fortran-77.
If one restriced oneself to writing DO loops as the F66 Standard defined them,
they are still portable to this day.
OTOH, there are a number of other things which early Fortrans supported
and have gone by the wayside. Easy target is Hollerith constants - which
was eliminated from the F77 Standards. There also things like some forms
of I/O which appeared in pre-66 ANS Fortran (e.g., READ INPUT TAPE.)
Additions to the list of intrinsic functions. The various things that
F95 'depricated' (including fixed form source code), etc.
Walt
-...-
Walt Spector
(w6ws at earthlink dot net)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: My philosophy
- From: John Harper
- Re: My philosophy
- References:
- My philosophy
- From: David Flower
- Re: My philosophy
- From: beliavsky
- Re: My philosophy
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Eric Lavigne
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Charles Russell
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Gary L. Scott
- Re: My philosophy
- From: David Flower
- My philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: cmplx(0.,-x) or -j*x
- Next by Date: gprof and optimization
- Previous by thread: Re: My philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: My philosophy
- Index(es):