Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Brooks Moses <bmoses-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:20:07 -0700
Richard E Maine wrote:
> In article <ubacmqezci.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Harald Anlauf <anlauf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Brooks Moses <bmoses-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > My impression, from reading the gfortran mailing list, is that the areas
> > > of incompleteness [in gfortran] are both in the odd corners of the F90/F95 additions
> > > and in the odd corners of the really old extensions....
>
> > You might want to check the bugzilla entries on ICE's on valid code.
> > E.g., I would not consider PR 15966 or PR 17917 weird nor belonging to
> > some odd corner....
>
> If the problems have only to do with odd corners of f90, then my code
> must be full of odd corners. Some might agree, I suppose. :-)
Well, every other corner of the code is odd, no? (The rest being even,
of course.)
Seriously, thanks to you both for correcting my impressions.
- Brooks
--
The "bmoses-nospam" address is valid; no unmunging needed.
.
- References:
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Brooks Moses
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- Prev by Date: Re: gprof and optimization
- Next by Date: Re: Troubles with some IMSL routines (eg EVLRG, and some other)
- Previous by thread: Re: gcc 4.0 and Fortran
- Next by thread: Visualising program structure
- Index(es):