Re: My philosophy
- From: "Michael Metcalf" <metcalfmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:09:55 +0200
"David Flower" <DavJFlower@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117267801.351319.213690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Can anyone tell me why FORTRAN90 declared alternate returns, but not
> ERR= descriptors, obsolescent ?
>
> It seems to me wildly inconsistent.
>
Right. They both conflict with the rules of structured programming, but
that's the way the committee decided (and I don't ever remember a comparison
being made). Neither are in F.
Regards,
Mike Metcalf
.
- References:
- My philosophy
- From: David Flower
- Re: My philosophy
- From: beliavsky
- Re: My philosophy
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Eric Lavigne
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Clive Page
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Andy Spragg
- Re: My philosophy
- From: Richard E Maine
- Re: My philosophy
- From: mcalhoun
- Re: My philosophy
- From: David Flower
- My philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: My philosophy
- Next by Date: Re: question about efficiency of fortran in parallel environments
- Previous by thread: Re: My philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: My philosophy
- Index(es):