Re: bye bye CVF
- From: helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply)
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:14:00 +0000 (UTC)
In article <d7olms$80q$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Walt Brainerd
<walt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I haven't seen anybody else post this, but it
> should be of interest to this group, so here it is.
>
> I personally thought CVF was a great product. Of course,
> one is expected to migrate to IVF.
>
> http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/tech/tech_TechSoftwareDetailPage_IDX/1,1703,7088,00.html
I remember migrating from VMS to OpenVMS. Quickest migration I ever
did! This is not much worse. CVF has its heritage in the VAX FORTRAN
compiler. In the wake of the demise of Alpha and HP buying Compaq (two
separate events which happened quite close together), many engineers
moved to Intel, including most or all of the Fortran folks. HP now gets
its Fortran compiler from Intel. Thus, under the hood IVF is probably
very similar to CVF.
Look up the thread here or in comp.os.vms where Steve Lionel explained
why the $!DEC directives are still in the compiler!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bye bye CVF
- From: Abdul Qat
- Re: bye bye CVF
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: bye bye CVF
- From: Abdul Qat
- Re: bye bye CVF
- References:
- bye bye CVF
- From: Walt Brainerd
- bye bye CVF
- Prev by Date: Re: bye bye CVF
- Next by Date: Re: Good compilable langauge for math and graphics?
- Previous by thread: Re: bye bye CVF
- Next by thread: Re: bye bye CVF
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading