Re: where vs. forall in f95
- From: robert.corbett@xxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Jun 2005 23:01:11 -0700
Based on your description, WHERE would seem the
better choice. FORALL would be better if you were
doing something fancy with subscripts.
WHERE, FORALL, and carefully written DO loops are
all equally likely (or unlikely) to paralllelize using a
modern compiler. I know many compilers that scalarize
first, then parallelize.
Bob Corbett
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: where vs. forall in f95
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: where vs. forall in f95
- References:
- where vs. forall in f95
- From: Ushnish Basu
- where vs. forall in f95
- Prev by Date: Re: g95 Fortran compiler on AMD opteron running SUN Solaris 10
- Next by Date: Re: Fortran 90/95 standard?
- Previous by thread: where vs. forall in f95
- Next by thread: Re: where vs. forall in f95
- Index(es):