Re: Announcing Intel Fortran Compilers 9.0

Steve,
regarding the non-commercial version, I understand Intel's concern. A
solution would be if one license fits both OS. I purchased the Windows
version and remain current on the maintenance. However, I cannot justify the
purchase of a separate Linux compiler, especially since I do not use it very
often. (Use is strictly non-commercial.) Something to think about....

Haje


"Steve Lionel" <Steve.Lionel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qrq5b19c13tl10msd2anpnro5tis0p0ce1@xxxxxxxxxx
>I know that this is "old news" to many of you, but I was on vacation
>earlier
> this week and was not able to post this before.
>
> Intel Visual Fortran Compiler 9.0 for Windows and Intel Fortran Compiler
> 9.0
> for Linux have now been released. New features include:
>
> * More features from Fortran 2003, including command line and system
> environment intrinsics
> * The ability to INQUIRE about directories
> * Full support for OpenMP 2.5, including WORKSHARE, enabling
> development
> of applications for multicore processors
> * Multi-file routine interface checking (this is really cool...)
> * Run-time detection of uninitialized variables (Windows-only for now -
> see Release Notes for additional details.)
> * Improved optimization at the default level (-O2)
> * Loops can now be both vectorized and parallelized
> * Software-based Speculative Precomputation optimization helps with
> shared-cache processors
> * Improved debugger support for optimized code
> * IMSL Fortran Library (Professional Edition for Windows only) now
> supports Intel EM64T
> * Ability to view PARAMETER constants in the debugger (not working in
> the
> initial release - will be available in the first update later in June.)
> * Improved installation and license acquisition process
> * Ability to run versions 9.0 and 8.1 side-by-side (compiler version
> selection tool in Visual Studio IDE)
> * 64-bit compiler for Intel EM64T is now included (yeah, I know that
> makes
> it even bigger - we're evaluating ways to deal with that), and explicit
> support for AMD Opteron is now claimed
>
> In collaboration with HP, which recently announced that they would
> discontinue
> sales of CVF as of December 31, 2005, we have brought back the special CVF
> Migration pricing for Intel Visual Fortran, and expanded it to include
> floating licenses. For more information, including a comparison chart, see
> our
> Upgrade from CVF page at
> http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/upgrade_to_ivf.htm
>
> We also opened a "CVF Migration Center" section of our user forum to help
> users make the transition.
> http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board?board.id=CVFMC
>
> For more information on what is new in 9.0, see the Release Notes and the
> Product Information pages
> (http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/fwin/ and
> http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/flin/)
>
> I read through some of the posts regarding our 9.0 release and can comment
> on
> a couple of the questions. If you have further questions, you can reply
> here
> or post in our user forum - I'll do the best I can.
>
> Q: What, other than the command argument and environment variable
> intrinsics,
> are new from F2003?
> A: Nothing major. Someone asked about TR15581, but that's not new for us.
> We
> already support many things from F2003 (for example, VOLATILE), but I know
> it
> would be helpful for me to come up with a list. I'll do that and post it
> in
> our user forum. We're doing our planning now for what comes next from
> F2003,
> based in large part on comments we've received from customers as to what
> is
> important to them.
>
> Q: Why is the non-commercial version not available yet?
> A: Who said "marketing"? I will comment that there has been increasing
> pressure to discontinue the non-commercial offering, partly due to the
> extensive abuse of it by companies and funded departments of educational
> institutions. The compromise for now is the stronger wording to
> discourage
> "casual" abuse.
>
> Q: Is this the first version based on CVF?
> A: No. Version 8.0 was. I'm uncertain what implied otherwise.
>
> Steve Lionel
> Software Products Division
> Intel Corporation
> Nashua, NH
>
> User communities for Intel Software Development Products
> http://softwareforums.intel.com/
> Intel Fortran Support
> http://developer.intel.com/software/products/support/


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: bye bye IVF (was: bye bye CVF)
    ... >> I personally thought CVF was a great product. ... >> one is expected to migrate to IVF. ... If Intel, in contrast to AMD, can't even get its chip microcode right, why ... The Help button is not yet supported in the Fortran AppWizard ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: On the future of Compaq Visual Fortran !
    ... > development of formerly Compaq Visual Fortran (CVF) for Windows ... it will be merged with Intel Fortran compiler. ... Compaq effectively sold to Intel various technologies ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Announcing Intel Fortran Compilers 9.0
    ... Intel Visual Fortran Compiler 9.0 for Windows and Intel Fortran Compiler 9.0 ... sales of CVF as of December 31, 2005, we have brought back the special CVF ... We also opened a "CVF Migration Center" section of our user forum to help ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: bye bye CVF
    ... CVF has its heritage in the VAX FORTRAN ... moved to Intel, including most or all of the Fortran folks. ... its Fortran compiler from Intel. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Free Fortran compiler that handles Cray-style pointers available?
    ... kindly replied to my posting there that Salford Fortran '95 for Windows ... Personal Edition can run in a Cygwin shell, but doesn't support ... what is Intel IIRC Fortran? ... Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows 8.1 or something else? ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
Loading