Re: Announcing Intel Fortran Compilers 9.0

Yes, my program is well suited for parallel processing. All floating
point
numbers are in double precision.

The comparison was performed on a single processor Opteron, I had
dual boot. The Linux was 64 bit and the Windows was XP. Since the
Windows
compilers were 32 bit, the run time were the same on XP and 2003.

If the speed improvement is significant, we need to shell some money to
upgrade
the compilers on Linux. Otherwise, if it is only 10%, lets say, we will
worry about in
the future.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Coding style article with interesting section on white space
    ... > Linux on Intel x86 at ... > compilers can be much larger, but that has less bearing on portability ... generation on Windows vs Linux (which _should_ pretty obviously be ... and code generator will be essentially unchanged across platforms, ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: novell-suse linux dead meat?
    ... >> Why not use StarOffice or OpenOffice for Windows? ... > compilers just to stay current with the technology. ... where the majority of my programming was being done. ... > I can have the latest and greatest on Linux for no cost while on the ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Upgrading XP machine to run gcc
    ... run under a Linux environment or another Windows cygwin environment but not a Windows environment unless I use cygwin to compile my own gcc-like compiler to do so. ... It sounds as if I would be very close to learning how to operate in the Linux environment. ... I'll point out that certain commercial compilers for linux aren't fully compatible with gcc-4.2. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Lisp without curses anyone?
    ... I develop mostly on linux, using gvim and sometime eclipse's c mode. ... I compiled on windows to make sure it works (btw compiling on ... different platforms and different compilers sometimes help you catch ... Using eclipse on windows to develop java is practically the same as ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.development)
  • Bogus Benchmark (was Re: JVM performance on Linux (vs. Solaris/Windows))
    ... Linux: http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2006q1/jbb2005-20060117-00062.html ... Solaris: http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2006q1/jbb2005-20060117-00063.html ... Windows: http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2006q1/jbb2005-20060117-00064.html ... Did they use the OSs' most common compilers ...
    (Linux-Kernel)