Re: (something) /= something ?
- From: "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:54:02 -0600
"James Giles" <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ifmwe.1045218$w62.405922@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm impressed that someone else found that workaround
> independently. It's not at all obvious that there's any relevance.
> In fact, my mental model of the problem that led me to try it
> I'm convinced is *not* the actual cause of the problem in
> the compiler (but, I'm still in the dark about what the
> compiler could possibly be doing there). I wonder what
> led FJRA to try it?
And I was impressed enough when you came up with it. Maybe
this should have been posted to comp.lang.fortran.voodoo?
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (something) /= something ?
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: (something) /= something ?
- References:
- (something) /= something ?
- From: FJRA
- Re: (something) /= something ?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: (something) /= something ?
- From: James Giles
- (something) /= something ?
- Prev by Date: Announce: Fortran Tools (additions)
- Next by Date: Re: (something) /= something ?
- Previous by thread: Re: (something) /= something ?
- Next by thread: Re: (something) /= something ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|