MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: Herman D. Knoble <SkipKnobleLESS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:56:43 -0400
Given a Subprogram that gets called millions of times,
we know that there is (CPU) overhead for subprogram linkage.
My question is, independent of compilers, which is more efficient
in practice:
passing a list of (say 3 to 10) arguments to a subprogram's
corresponding parameters,
OR using a Module and companion USE statement,
OR use named COMMON?
Skip Knoble
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: E. Robert Tisdale
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: Joost
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: Duane Bozarth
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Prev by Date: Re: (something) /= something ?
- Next by Date: Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Previous by thread: Announce: Fortran Tools (additions)
- Next by thread: Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Index(es):