Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:23:57 -0600
"John Harper" <harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1120081442.68803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I had thought the way to get y into f was by COMMON before f90, and by
> using a module nowadays. What would Robert have me do?
Using a Note 12.12 compliant compiler, make f an internal function
of a RECURSIVE subroutine and create multiple instances of f with
different value of y (through host association).
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
.
- References:
- MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: E. Robert Tisdale
- Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- From: John Harper
- MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Prev by Date: question about intel compiler
- Next by Date: Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Previous by thread: Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Next by thread: Re: MODULEand USE versus Argument Passing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|