Re: backslash-issues
- From: Richard E Maine <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:10:41 -0700
In article <1120145612.60177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bart Vandewoestyne <MyFirstName.MyLastName@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This leads me to the conclusion that if you also want to be F-compliant, then
> this is the best solution so far (until maybe someone comes up with a better
> one :-)
>
> character(len=*), parameter :: backslash = char(92)
>
> With the only remark that you have to hope that your Fortran compiler uses
> the ASCII collating sequence for it's character numbering.
My suggestion for a "better" one would be to beat on the F folk to
support ACHAR. I don't know how hard you'd have to beat, though. Try not
to do permanent damage as several of them are personal friends. :-)
--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- [OT] Re: backslash-issues
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- [OT] Re: backslash-issues
- References:
- backslash-issues
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: backslash-issues
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: backslash-issues
- From: Joost
- Re: backslash-issues
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: backslash-issues
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- backslash-issues
- Prev by Date: Re: HELP ME - HOW THIS ERROR?
- Next by Date: Re: backslash-issues
- Previous by thread: Re: backslash-issues
- Next by thread: [OT] Re: backslash-issues
- Index(es):