Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: "David Frank" <dave_frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:28:33 GMT
"James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AuadnSzA2pHaJnLfRVn-rA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Well, yes, I didn't make that particular mistake. If the input
> string already contained your sentinel character, the output
> would not, so it would be incorrect.
>
You consider NULL a ascii text character so it cant be used as a masking
char?
Is there any "sentinel" character that you dont object to using for a
"sentinel", how about char(1) ?
>> Didnt you say your solution has a problem with exact size text in line?
>
> As does yours.
>
OK, I see what you are complaining about, the first blank in the trailing
blanks returned is just part
of the trailing blanks, BFD.. I guess we dont agree its a problem that must
be addressed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- References:
- Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Prev by Date: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Next by Date: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Previous by thread: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Next by thread: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|