Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:49:20 -0600
"David Frank" <dave_frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BPPHe.1990$ns.357@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Is there any "sentinel" character that you dont object to using for a
> "sentinel", how about char(1) ?
Nope. The appropriate solution is an extra LOGICAL array to
hold the result of the test, not trying to store the results
back in the CHARACTER array somehow.
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Giles
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- References:
- Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- From: David Frank
- Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Prev by Date: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Next by Date: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Previous by thread: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Next by thread: Re: Parsing challenge to reduce blanks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|