Re: Unsupported Intel Fortran compiler for Linux




Maybe I was not clear about the point of my question.
I do not care about support; just want the ability to run the
free linux intel compiler for unlimited time.


In that case, can I suggest gfortran or g95? Both of them are very good Fortran 90/95 compilers and are free. They might not be supporting all the features yet, but they are evolving very fast. Besides, gfortran is already included in GCC 4.0 onwards. gfortran is GPLed software and can always use some testers (the more the merrier).


If you were to choose between gfortran and g95, I would suggest to use gfortran (but that is completely a personal preference).

Which linux distribution are you using? If you are using Debian (either testing or unstable), installing gfortran & its corresponding documentation is just one command.

apt-get install gfortran gfortran-doc

That's it. It cant get simpler than that. More information about Fortran 90 compilers on Debian can be found at

http://wiki.debian.net/?fortran90compiler

raju
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Suspicious Gfortran
    ... Fortran 77 compilers that exist, and thus doesn't mean anything in this ... problem is coming from a bug in your code, rather than a bug in gfortran. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Zero-size arrays
    ... were also found in ifort, gfortran, pathscale and some more which I do ... and commercial compilers in this regard; ... Fortran 90/95, but with configure check also things like Fortran ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Zero-size arrays
    ... were also found in ifort, gfortran, pathscale and some more which I do ... and commercial compilers in this regard; ... Fortran 90/95, but with configure check also things like Fortran ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • array bounds checking -- comparing compilers
    ... Gfortran catches some uses of non-conforming arrays that some other ... compilers, including g95, do not. ... I think that in Fortran 2003, when an allocatable array appears on the ... nonconformant arrays (with the graphical debugger pointing to ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
    ... Some vendors phased out their F77 compilers over 10 ... No need to support a seperate F77 compiler as, ... experience with F77) that the F95 programming is safer than the F77 ... Authors are not chosing more recent Fortran ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)