Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: "David Frank" <dave_frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:50:56 GMT
"*** Hendrickson" <***.hendrickson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hwlPe.671989$cg1.127070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> What would have happened in your model if
> you had a(20) and b(5) for the array sizes?
I would never provide such a case since it DISOBEYS my assertion.
>> My assertion is:
>> as long as "b,c" arrays are at least the size of "a" there wont be a
>> bounds fault in CVF,
>> does this assertion hold for your compiler?
>>
.
- References:
- Acceptable Pack args
- From: David Frank
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: David Frank
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: David Frank
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: David Frank
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: David Frank
- Re: Acceptable Pack args
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Acceptable Pack args
- Prev by Date: interface blocks
- Next by Date: java -> fortran bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: Acceptable Pack args
- Next by thread: Re: Acceptable Pack args
- Index(es):