Re: NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- From: kargl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steven G. Kargl)
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1125079100.503410.132770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Rodrigo López Negrete" <soyrush@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Which version of gfortran are you using (ie gfortran --version)?
>> What OS and where did you get your binary? What compiler flags
>> are you using?
>
> $ gfortran --version returns:
>
> GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20050406 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.41.fc3))
> Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
I don't use RH, so I can't advise on an upgrade path.
However, at a minimum you probably want to update to
4.0.1 and if you build your own binaries I'd recommend
either the gcc-4_0-branch cvs branch or mainline.
Someone else mentioned intialization of uninitialized
variables. Gfortran will not initialize variables to
zero (ifort may do this for you).
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
.
- References:
- NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- From: rlopneg
- Re: NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- From: Rodrigo López Negrete
- NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- Prev by Date: Re: [CHALLENGE] finding rightmost zero bit
- Next by Date: Re: [CHALLENGE] finding rightmost zero bit
- Previous by thread: Re: NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- Next by thread: Re: NLEQ1 and open source Fortran
- Index(es):