comp.lang.fortran

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Ken Fairfield
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Request for C2F.ZIP
  • From: David Frank
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Request for C2F.ZIP
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: robin
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Malloc in PGI Fortran 90
  • From: niteshkpatil
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: arth - function in Numerical Recipes (F90)
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: bv
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: prasad413in
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Rich
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• [OT] Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Rich
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Rich
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: apm
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Rich
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: Dan Nagle
• compilation cascades and new Fortran features
  • From: Pierre Hugonnet
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: James Giles
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Anton Haumer
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: John Harper
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: DAY Number in an Year
  • From: ttw
• DAY Number in an Year
  • From: prasad413in
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: John Harper
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• NEWBIE QUESTION
  • From: richard symonds
• Re: BSTR and Allocatable arrays
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: BSTR and Allocatable arrays
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• BSTR and Allocatable arrays
  • From: apm
• Re: Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Can Fortran Use This C Variable Directly Via "external" Decl?
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: WRITE-- FORMAT question
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: David Flower
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: WRITE-- FORMAT question
  • From: prasad413in
• Re: WRITE-- FORMAT question
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: apm
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: Andy Vaught
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: apm
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: apm
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Andy Spragg
• Re: Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Fortran and .NET (C#)
  • From: apm
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: David Flower
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Millena
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Millena
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: gh14tq5@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: FX
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Does this string processing work for you?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: robert . corbett
• Intel Fortran license?
  • From: Donald Arseneau
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: John Harper
• Re: Pointer
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Pointer
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Pointer
  • From: Jason C
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: array of pointers
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• array of pointers
  • From: Millena
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: apm
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: apm
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: declaring array arguments in subroutines
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Janne Blomqvist
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Ariane
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Transfer function in initialization expression ?
  • From: Udo Grabowski
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: apm
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Mike Zulauf
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Mike Zulauf
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Mike Zulauf
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• [DISLIN] Focus of graphic window, file selector box
  • From: Hani Andreas Ibrahim
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: Earned Value Management System (EVMS) (was Fortran) is eating my brain
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: Fortran is eating my brain
  • From: qqcq6s59
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Charles Russell
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: g95 + bytewapio
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• g95 + bytewapio
  • From: Jeff Layton
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Mike Zulauf
• Re: Fortran is eating my brain
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Fortran is eating my brain
  • From: qqcq6s59
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Classical Fortran textbook
  • From: Mike Kupferschmid
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Ben Hetland
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Ariane V
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Enumerations in fortran 2003
  • From: gaurav
• Re: quickwin graphics in CVF
  • From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Ariane
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: masa
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Ariane V
  • From: robin
• Re: Ariane
  • From: robin
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: robin
• Re: Ariane
  • From: robin
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: James Giles
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: John Harper
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: robin
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: James Giles
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: andy2O
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Walter Spector
• moving up to f90/f95: automatic arrays, stack limits, etc
  • From: Mike Zulauf
• Re: quickwin graphics in CVF
  • From: FJRA
• ambiguous INTREFACE
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• quickwin graphics in CVF
  • From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: kis
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: James Parsly
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Chris
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Ariane
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Ariane
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Ariane
  • From: Dan Nagle
• Re: Ariane (was: What about NANs)
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: PGI F90v5.1 bug -- fixed in later editions?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Ariane (was: What about NANs)
  • From: robin
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: robin
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: robin
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: robin
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: DRAIN-2DX compile
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: DRAIN-2DX compile
  • From: Les
• Re: DRAIN-2DX compile
  • From: nancy80
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: masa
• Re: DRAIN-2DX compile
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: kis
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: kis
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: building a project and creating a dynamik link library
  • From: bv
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: kis
• g95 bug with ENTRY
  • From: John Harper
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: John Harper
• CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Chris
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: FJRA
• Re: CSHIFT in G95 ?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• OOP with FORTRAN
  • From: kis
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: J.F. Cornwall
• ........Continue
  • From: nancy80
• Re: OT: What about NANs
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: David Jones
• Re: OT: What about NANs
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: What about NANs
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: Printing with F95
  • From: Dick Russell
• Re: OT: What about NANs
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Printing with F95
  • From: masa
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: nancy80
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: nancy80
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: nancy80
• OT: What about NANs
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• DRAIN-2DX compile
  • From: nancy80
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: nancy80
• Re: PGI F90v5.1 bug -- fixed in later editions?
  • From: John Mansell
• Re: fortran 90 debugging on linux
  • From: Alfredo Buttari
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: mcalhoun
• Re: fortran 90 debugging on linux
  • From: Roberto Waltman
• PGI F90v5.1 bug -- fixed in later editions?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: robin
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Walt Brainerd
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Clive Page
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: SC Huang
• Warning: Because of COMMON...............
  • From: nancy80
• How does company culture affect you?
  • From: bruce_taylor
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Why is Fortran not case-sensitive?
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: [newbie,gfortran] Error: Symbol 'aint' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: [newbie,gfortran] Error: Symbol 'aint' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
  • From: FX
• Re: Almost equal
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: [newbie,gfortran] Error: Symbol 'aint' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• [newbie,gfortran] Error: Symbol 'aint' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
  • From: Thomas Baruchel
• Re: building a project and creating a dynamik link library
  • From: halise
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: robin
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: robin
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: John Harper
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Almost equal
  • From: rih5342
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: Almost equal
  • From: John H. Lindsay
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Almost equal
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: building a project and creating a dynamik link library
  • From: Jugoslav Dujic
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: andrea mordini
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• building a project and creating a dynamik link library
  • From: halise
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
  • From: robin
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Bob Walton
• Re: complex arithmetics
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• complex arithmetics
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: bv
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: pseudoinverse
  • From: andrea mordini
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Harshal
• Re: Almost equal
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: ENTRY Statement Obsolescence
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Almost equal
  • From: rih5342
• Re: ENTRY Statement Obsolescence
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: ENTRY Statement Obsolescence
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: andy2O
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Edward N Bromhead
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: ENTRY Statement Obsolescence
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• ENTRY Statement Obsolescence
  • From: gary . l . scott
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: bricknews
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• pseudoinverse
  • From: andrea mordini
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: beliavsky
• Passing functions CONTAINed in a subroutine to other functions
  • From: bricknews
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Harshal
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Harshal
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Harshal
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: andy2O
• Re: comparing files
  • From: bricknews
• Re: want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Random Programmer
• want to save memory in sparse matrix
  • From: Harshal
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: David Flower
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: robin
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: robin
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: John Harper
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: Thomas Baruchel
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: J. F. Cornwall
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Walter Spector
• RE: [Fortran 77] swaping two arrays (newbie)
  • From: meek
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Venni
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: N. Shamsundar
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Handling zero**-2.0 in CVF?
  • From: Stig Kildegård Andersen
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Christoph Arns
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: kis
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: John Harper
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: John Harper
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: kis
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: kis
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: FJRA
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Madhusudan Singh
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: zero values on dynamic array
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• zero values on dynamic array
  • From: kis
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: David Frank
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: John Harper
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: andy2O
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Ian Chivers
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Ian Chivers
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Ian Chivers
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: David Frank
• Alternatives for EXTERNAL?
  • From: Carlie J. Coats
• Re: JAVA as HPC langauge...
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Ian Chivers
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Steven G. Kargl
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: JAVA as HPC langauge...
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Paul Van Delst
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: JAVA as HPC langauge...
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Ugo
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Erik Edelmann
• Refactorings for Fortran and HighPerformance
  • From: Asheesh
• JAVA as HPC langauge...
  • From: Asheesh
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: andy2O
• Re: Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Venni
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: comparing files
  • From: David Flower
• Re: comparing files
  • From: David Flower
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: Edward N Bromhead
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: flexible input parameter file
  • From: FJRA
• flexible input parameter file
  • From: SC Huang
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Ryo
• Re: comparing files
  • From: Thomas Koenig
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Dushan Mitrovich
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: beliavsky
• How to test minimum value argument to EXP
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Toby White
• Re: comparing files
  • From: David Frank
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: GF Thomas
• Re: comparing files
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: comparing files
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• comparing files
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: GF Thomas
• Re: Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Problems with NAG f95
  • From: Venni
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Ryo
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: PL/I Cant create a Upper case function
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: John Harper
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Ian Chivers
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: DBrown
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Richard E Maine
• why system providing routies will provide different result in C++ and Fortran
  • From: Qian Xin
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Chris Hulbert
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: David Frank
• Re: reading ascii file with header
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• reading ascii file with header
  • From: Ralf Schaa
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: David Flower
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What do the symbols do in the following example: []
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: What do the symbols do in the following example: []
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: What do the symbols do in the following example: []
  • From: David Frank
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: Edward N Bromhead
• Re: What do the symbols do in the following example: []
  • From: Ron Shepard
• What do the symbols do in the following example: []
  • From: jdturner
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: David Frank
• Comparing characters ignoring case
  • From: smokesingdance
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Ken Plotkin
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Gary L. Scott
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Michael Metcalf
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Dushan Mitrovich
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: Jim
• Re: Calling Convention of EXTERNAL
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Calling Convention of EXTERNAL
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Calling Convention of EXTERNAL
  • From: apm
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Michael Prager
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: file reading problem
  • From: Dick Hendrickson
• file reading problem
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Ron Shepard
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Rich Townsend
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: p . kinsler
• collective nouns -- Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• RE: file reading problem
  • From: meek
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: weathergirl1234
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn
• Re: Optimal programming advice (Attn: Mr. James Van Buskirk)
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn
• UUencoded Timer_CVF.obj Re: Optimal programming advice (Attn: Mr. James Van Buskirk)
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Steve Lionel
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimal programming advice (Attn: Mr. James Van Buskirk)
  • From: Gojko Magazinovic
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Walter Spector
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Klemens Barfus
• Re: Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Access violation after nullifiying and again allocating pointer
  • From: Klemens Barfus
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Herman D . Knoble
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Toby White
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Harold Stevens
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: robert . corbett
• Re: Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: Gareth Owen
• Re: which Linux versions?
  • From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Partial derivatives of gridded data
  • From: weathergirl1234
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Brooks Moses
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Mr Hrundi V Bakshi
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Richard Maine
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Loop/cache optimization question
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Greg Lindahl
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: James Giles
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: e p chandler
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: E. Robert Tisdale
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: beliavsky
• Re: Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: [JvO]
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: G95: Zero Known Bugs
  • From: Andy Vaught
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: Gordon Sande
• Re: Format statements from an input file?
  • From: Duane Bozarth
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Format statements from an input file?
  • From: Random Programmer
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Gordon Sande
• f77 - conversion of hollerith integers to character
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: David Jones
• Slides for presentation on F2003
  • From: Bart Vandewoestyne
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Richard E Maine
• Re: reshape: copy in/out
  • From: Jan Vorbrüggen
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Michel OLAGNON
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: David Flower
• Re: Optimal programming advice
  • From: Arjen Markus
• Optimal programming advice
  • From: Glyn Edwards
• Re: Strange Problem
  • From: Arjen Markus
• for lorrayne: intriguing photos - ic iw uz - (1/1)
  • From: birch
• Re: reshape: copy in/out
  • From: James Giles
• Re: Strange Problem
  • From: student
• Strange Problem
  • From: student