Re: Does this string processing work for you?




"*** Hendrickson" <***.hendrickson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Vyf_e.85225$qY1.56431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>>
> It's not that it was overlooked, it's that there is no
> good way to do it.

And the reason that so many compilers GET IT RIGHT IS?



.


Quantcast