Re: Does this string processing work for you?

David Frank wrote:
>
> "*** Hendrickson" <***.hendrickson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Vyf_e.85225$qY1.56431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >>
> > It's not that it was overlooked, it's that there is no
> > good way to do it.
>
> And the reason that so many compilers GET IT RIGHT IS?

Luck that the particular compiler you chose did what you think is right
in a particular case...
.