Has anyone noticed the similarities between C# and Fortran 90, particularly
in aspects where Fortran 90 and C++ differ? I seem to remember Fortran 90
allowing arrays to be returned by functions. Was there "garbage collection"
in Fortran 90 or was there reference counting? Rather than C/C++ like
pointers, are pointers in Fortran 90 more similar to references and
reference types in C#?
Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java? ... > C doesn't have multidimensional arrays,... you must use pointers to pointers instead, ... properties from Fortran (efficient code, separate compilation, ... However C didn't borrow object orientation... (comp.lang.java)
Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java? ... > C doesn't have multidimensional arrays,... you must use pointers to pointers instead, ... properties from Fortran (efficient code, separate compilation, ... However C didn't borrow object orientation... (comp.lang.cpp)
Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java? ... > C doesn't have multidimensional arrays,... you must use pointers to pointers instead, ... properties from Fortran (efficient code, separate compilation, ... However C didn't borrow object orientation... (sci.crypt)
Re: INTERFACE problem ... I have an integer at Fortran side, pass it by reference to C function, treat here as pointer, allocate memory and this C-pointer at Fortran side now is an integer which has represents address allocated at C side. ... I did something like this many years ago to allow dynamic allocation... Then it was converted into a subroutine with the arrays and ... it called the sub by way of Pascal with those "pointers".... (comp.lang.fortran)
Re: INTERFACE problem ... I have an integer at Fortran side, ... >it by reference to C function, treat here as pointer, allocate memory... C pointers and arrays... WHen the Main got the now initialized "pointers"... (comp.lang.fortran)
